BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8302695)

  • 21. Clinical track faculty: merits and issues.
    Lee WH; Kim CJ; Roh YS; Shin H; Kim MJ
    J Prof Nurs; 2007; 23(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 17292128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Essential features of a faculty evaluation program.
    Mackenzie RS
    J Dent Educ; 1977 Jun; 41(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 267118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using a peer evaluation system to assess faculty performance and competence.
    Rosenbaum ME; Ferguson KJ; Kreiter CD; Johnson CA
    Fam Med; 2005 Jun; 37(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 15933916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical career ladders: the Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital.
    Crouch JB; Douglas JB; Wheeler DS
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Nov; 46(11):2272-5. PubMed ID: 2589341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Appraisal of teachers in the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool.
    Faull WB; Taylor IR; Gaskell CJ
    Vet Rec; 1992 Dec 19-26; 131(25-26):579-83. PubMed ID: 1287953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Creating synergy to restructure a college of pharmacy's teaching site.
    Vogel DP; Barone J
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):40-4. PubMed ID: 10164158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. North American dental students' perspectives about their clinical education.
    Henzi D; Davis E; Jasinevicius R; Hendricson W
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):361-77. PubMed ID: 16595529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A performance appraisal system for clinical pharmacy services.
    Witte KW; Hutchinson RA
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1984; 6(2):12-5. PubMed ID: 10265721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Awarding faculty rank to non-tenured physician faculty in a consortium medical school.
    Williamson JC; Schrop SL; Costa AJ
    Fam Med; 2008 Jan; 40(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 18172796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A system for documentation of pharmacist interventions with incorporation into performance and quality improvement plans.
    Brown BL; Williamson SE
    Hosp Pharm; 1993 Nov; 28(11):1083-4, 1086-8. PubMed ID: 10130385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of two different faculty development interventions on third-year clerkship performance evaluations.
    Ogden PE; Edwards J; Howell M; Via RM; Song J
    Fam Med; 2008 May; 40(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 18465282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
    dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Faculty performance evaluation: the CIPP-SAPS model.
    Mitcham M
    J Allied Health; 1981 Nov; 10(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 7328038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Critical care pharmacy services in United States hospitals.
    Maclaren R; Devlin JW; Martin SJ; Dasta JF; Rudis MI; Bond CA
    Ann Pharmacother; 2006 Apr; 40(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 16569803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analyzing the teaching effectiveness of clinical nursing faculty of full- and part-time generic BSN, LPN-BSN, and RN-BSN nursing students.
    Beitz JM; Wieland D
    J Prof Nurs; 2005; 21(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 15682159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of clinical service contracts between hospital pharmacies and colleges of pharmacy.
    Anderson RJ
    Hosp Pharm; 1992 Jun; 27(6):499, 503-7. PubMed ID: 10118593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of an objective structured clinical examination in evaluating student performance.
    Prislin MD; Fitzpatrick CF; Lie D; Giglio M; Radecki S; Lewis E
    Fam Med; 1998 May; 30(5):338-44. PubMed ID: 9597531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are anonymous evaluations a better assessment of faculty teaching performance? A comparative analysis of open and anonymous evaluation processes.
    Afonso NM; Cardozo LJ; Mascarenhas OA; Aranha AN; Shah C
    Fam Med; 2005 Jan; 37(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15619155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality experiential education.
    ; Haase KK; Smythe MA; Orlando PL; Resman-Targoff BH; Smith LS; Herner SJ; Dee Melnyk S; Paolini NM; Porter KB; Rodgers PT; Spunt AL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2008 Dec; 28(12):1547. PubMed ID: 19025437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.