These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8303033)

  • 1. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurse "pushed the baby back into the womb". Case in point: De Leon v. Hosp. of Albert Einstein Col. (566 N.Y.S 2d 213--NY 1991).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Apr; 31(11):2. PubMed ID: 2041872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expert sets high standards for nurses in delivery death case. Case on point: McGrath v. Baylor University Medical Center, 2000 WL1222039 S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Dec; 41(7):2. PubMed ID: 11995072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurse "fails to recall": blockbuster judgment. Case in point: Salas v. Wang (846 F. 2d 897--NJ 1988).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Aug; 29(3):2. PubMed ID: 3413281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are nurses held to same standards of care as physicians? Case in point: Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (6 Cal Rptr. 2d 900-CA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jun; 33(1):4. PubMed ID: 1626055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are physicians "primed" by nurses?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):1. PubMed ID: 1454992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Struck off--the midwife who obeyed doctor's orders.
    Rosser J
    Pract Midwife; 1999 Apr; 2(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 10427280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurses testify as hostile witnesses.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):1. PubMed ID: 3368574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure to "fully communicate": catastrophic results. Case in point: Baptist Medical Center v. Wilson 618 So. 2d 1335--AL (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Aug; 34(3):2. PubMed ID: 8198619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurse and the law. Informed consent and self-determination.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Aug; 22(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 1445015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. KY: Newborn delivered into commode: no inury to newborn--no cause of action. James v. Ashland Hospital Corp., (1/22/2010)-KY.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Apr; 50(11):3. PubMed ID: 20503505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurses fail to timely respond: uterus ruptures--neurological injuries. Case on point: Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hosp., 2002 WL 1269344 S.E.2d.-VA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jun; 43(1):2. PubMed ID: 12154444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.