These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8303258)

  • 1. ORI and misconduct investigations.
    Bivens LW
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):593. PubMed ID: 8303258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imanishi-Kari case: ORI finds fraud.
    Stone R; Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5190):1468-9. PubMed ID: 7985007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ORI drops Gallo case in legal dispute.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5137):1202-3. PubMed ID: 8235643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
    Chubin DE
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
    Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The aftermath of the Gallo case.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside.
    Youngner JS
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 9424047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ORI's self-assessment: a batting average of .920?
    Friedly J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5304):1255. PubMed ID: 9064778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HHS: Gallo guilty of misconduct.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5092):168-70. PubMed ID: 8380653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case.
    Stone R
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.