These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond. Pascal CB Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tougher crackdown on fraud needed. del Guercio P Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):823. PubMed ID: 9732860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime. Kline S J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The assault on David Baltimore. Kevles DJ New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower. Poon P J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms. Steele F Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo. Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Spring helps research integrity report resurface. Marwick C JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. Rennie D BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The American experience: lessons learned. Rhoades LJ Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 11273443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview. Lafollette MC Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 10964254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The institutional context for research. Berger EM; Gert B Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):17-46. PubMed ID: 11655037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]