These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8303286)
1. Academy warns against slipping ethics. Anderson C Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5148):747. PubMed ID: 8303286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institute of Medicine study supports state regulation of medical isotopes over NRC. Silver S J Nucl Med; 1996 Feb; 37(2):23N. PubMed ID: 8667050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint. Price AR J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Regulatory agencies call on scientific institutions to address misconduct. Tilyou SM J Nucl Med; 1989 Nov; 30(11):1761-4. PubMed ID: 2809740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HHS proposes revised regulations on misconduct in research. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jun; 33(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 15179427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Counterterrorism. U.S. science agencies begin to lend a hand. Malakoff D; Koenig R Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5543):761-2. PubMed ID: 11679639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Panels look for common ground. Kaiser J Science; 1996 Apr; 272(5261):476. PubMed ID: 8614789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions. Fox MF; Braxton JM J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science and government. Improving science and technology advice for Congress. Morgan MG; Houghton A; Gibbons JH Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1999-2000. PubMed ID: 11557862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct. Wadman M Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct. Hackett EJ J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule. US Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Technology assessment. Continuing uncertainty. Perry S N Engl J Med; 1986 Jan; 314(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 3941712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Academy under fire over plans for new study of DNA statistics.. Macilwain C Nature; 1994 Jan; 367(6459):101. PubMed ID: 8114894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. National Research Council Board recommends restructuring of U.S. HLRW disposal program. Ghosh PR J Nucl Med; 1991 Jan; 32(1):15N-19N, 26N. PubMed ID: 1988621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What your research-integrity officer would like you to know. Garfinkel S; Rupp DE; Qualkenbush L; Lehmann C Nature; 2019 May; 569(7754):40. PubMed ID: 31040415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioterrorism. NAS censors report on agriculture threats. Mervis J; Stokstad E Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5589):1973-5. PubMed ID: 12242412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Academy and presidential panel issue AIDS reports. Ezzell C Nature; 1988 Jun; 333(6173):485. PubMed ID: 3374590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]