143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8303450)
21. Three-dimensional image-guided placement of S2 alar screws to adjunct or salvage lumbosacral fixation.
Nottmeier EW; Pirris SM; Balseiro S; Fenton D
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 20434406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.
Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hydroxyapatite enhancement of posterior spinal instrumentation fixation.
Spivak JM; Neuwirth MG; Labiak JJ; Kummer FJ; Ricci JL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Apr; 19(8):955-64. PubMed ID: 8009355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.
Lim TH; Kim JG; Fujiwara A; Yoon TT; Lee SC; Ha JW; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2498-503. PubMed ID: 11707718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: Galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws.
Peelle MW; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Sides B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2392-8; discussion 2399. PubMed ID: 16985470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of cyclic loading on pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Zhu Q; Lu WW; Holmes AD; Zheng Y; Zhong S; Leong JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 May; 25(9):1065-9. PubMed ID: 10788849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimum 2-year analysis of sacropelvic fixation and L5-S1 fusion using S1 and iliac screws.
Kuklo TR; Bridwell KH; Lewis SJ; Baldus C; Blanke K; Iffrig TM; Lenke LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(18):1976-83. PubMed ID: 11547195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
Bozkuş H; Senoğlu M; Baek S; Sawa AG; Ozer AF; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20121354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of sagittal insertion angle on intrapedicular bending moments.
Youssef JA; McKinley TO; Yerby SA; McLain RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(11):1077-81. PubMed ID: 10361656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbosacral reconstruction techniques for spondylolisthesis: an in vitro porcine model.
Cunningham BW; Lewis SJ; Long J; Dmitriev AE; Linville DA; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):2321-7. PubMed ID: 12438979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability. A synthetic model.
McLain RF; McKinley TO; Yerby SA; Smith TS; Sarigul-Klijn N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jul; 22(13):1454-60. PubMed ID: 9231963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Loosening of sacral screw fixation under in vitro fatigue loading.
Lu WW; Zhu Q; Holmes AD; Luk KD; Zhong S; Leong JC
J Orthop Res; 2000 Sep; 18(5):808-14. PubMed ID: 11117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of instrumented pedicle screws to evaluate load sharing in posterior dynamic stabilization systems.
Meyers K; Tauber M; Sudin Y; Fleischer S; Arnin U; Girardi F; Wright T
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 18037350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation.
Early S; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1396-401. PubMed ID: 15959368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical Comparison of Sacral Fixation Characteristics of Standard S1-Pedicle Screw Fixation versus a Novel Constrained S1-Dual-Screw Anchorage in the S1-Pedicle and S1-Alar Bone.
Mayer M; Stephan D; Resch H; Augat P; Auffarth A; Blocher M; Ernstbrunner L; Hitzl W; Defossez H; Rouge R; Koller H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Dec; 40(24):1890-7. PubMed ID: 26571158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pull-out strength of sacral implants using Cotrel-Dubousset fixation devices.
de Peretti F; Benoliel J; Hovorka I; Eude P; Omar F; Aboulker C; Bourgeon A; Argenson C
Eur Spine J; 1992 Dec; 1(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 20054934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation. Biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation.
Chiba M; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA; Smith TS; Benson DR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 8742203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sacral fixation using iliac instrumentation and a variable-angle screw device. Technical note.
Baldwin NG; Benzel EC
J Neurosurg; 1994 Aug; 81(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 8027820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation.
Emami A; Deviren V; Berven S; Smith JA; Hu SS; Bradford DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):776-86. PubMed ID: 11923673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
