These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8304681)

  • 1. Detection of warble tones in wideband noise with and without hearing protection devices.
    Letowski T; McGee L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1993 Dec; 37(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 8304681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communication in noise with acoustic and electronic hearing protection devices.
    Plyler PN; Klumpp ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Jul; 14(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 12956309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compensated active noise cancellation earphone for audiometric screening tests in noisy environments.
    Chang HY; Luo CH; Lo TS; Tai CC
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):747-753. PubMed ID: 31215819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of hearing protection devices on speech intelligibility of Persian employees.
    Karami M; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Hamidi Nahrani M
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):529. PubMed ID: 33176877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Most Comfortable Listening Level and Speech Attenuation by Hearing Protectors.
    Letowski T; Magistro DM; Ritter AC
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 1995 Jan; 1(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 10603546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training to Improve Spatial Hearing and Situation Awareness when Wearing Hearing Protection.
    Golob EJ; Nelson JT; Walasek JA; Piedra ET; Mock JR; Adams MJK; Esquivel CCR; Spear CSA
    Mil Med; 2024 Jan; 189(1-2):e306-e312. PubMed ID: 37715688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Augmented warning sound detection for hearing protectors.
    Bernstein ER; Brammer AJ; Yu G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL29-34. PubMed ID: 24437853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Active and Passive Hearing Protection Devices on Sound Source Localization, Speech Recognition, and Tone Detection.
    Brown AD; Beemer BT; Greene NT; Argo T; Meegan GD; Tollin DJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136568. PubMed ID: 26313145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Speech Level as a Function of Background Noise Level and Talker-to-Listener Distance for Talkers Wearing Hearing Protection Devices.
    Bouserhal RE; Bockstael A; MacDonald E; Falk TH; Voix J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3393-3403. PubMed ID: 29204606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental assessment of the effect of wearing hearing protectors on the audibility of railway warning signals for normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Arz JP; Grimault N; El Sawaf O
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Dec; 28(4):2385-2395. PubMed ID: 34633273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing in young adults. Part I: The effects of attitudes and beliefs toward noise, hearing loss, and hearing protector devices.
    Keppler H; Dhooge I; Vinck B
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):237-44. PubMed ID: 26356365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection and reaction thresholds for reverse alarms in noise with and without passive hearing protection.
    Laroche C; Giguère C; Vaillancourt V; Roy K; Pageot LP; Nélisse H; Ellaham N; Nassrallah F
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S51-S60. PubMed ID: 29172790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audibility of reverse alarms under hearing protectors for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Ergonomics; 1995 Nov; 38(11):2281-99. PubMed ID: 7498188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.
    Valentin O; John SM; Laville F
    Noise Health; 2017; 19(86):1-9. PubMed ID: 28164933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.