244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8306004)
1. Rejoinder to Elwood's reply.
Kopans DB
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Apr; Doc No 47():[1069 words; 5 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to Kopans.
Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 43():[1183 words; 9 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Miller AB
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2164; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening for breast cancer. Reply to the commentaries.
Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8055440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comment on the Elwood Paper.
Kopans DB
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 42():[1687 words; 8 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8117361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines.
Jackson VP
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 12409561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Thornton H
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2165; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography.
Prescrire Int; 2006 Oct; 15(85):192-3. PubMed ID: 17128530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening].
Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC
Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Senn S
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2165; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years.
Feig SA
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(11):2035-9. PubMed ID: 9392324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods to identify benefit from mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years.
Feig SA
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 8888216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Controversies on screening mammography].
Steinke K; Dellas S; Bongartz G
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2005 Mar; 94(13):515-9. PubMed ID: 15839468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent?
Baines CJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1508-11. PubMed ID: 14559870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic screening trials for women aged under 50.
Furnival CM; Hirst C
Med J Aust; 1995 Oct; 163(7):384-5. PubMed ID: 7565266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A different view on what is known about breast screening and the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Baines CJ
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1207-11. PubMed ID: 8055439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women: correction.
Elwood M; Cox B; Richardson A
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1994 Mar; Doc No 121():[385 words; 4 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8136940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening.
Harris R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(14):1021-3. PubMed ID: 16030293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Additional comments on screening mammography.
Sontheimer DL
Am Fam Physician; 2001 Sep; 64(6):922; author reply 924, 927. PubMed ID: 11578029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. After 40 years, mammography remains as much emotion as science.
Randal J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1630-2. PubMed ID: 11036103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
