These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 830614)
1. To the Constitution: a bicentennial tribute. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1977 Jan; 51(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 830614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Civil rights commission pushes investigation of age discrimination in federally assisted programs. Geriatrics; 1976 Apr; 31(4):12-6. PubMed ID: 944155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Immigrants' rights to health care. Drake SB Clgh Rev; 1986; 20(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 11659094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; policy interpretation--Office for Civil Rights, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(197):58509-11. PubMed ID: 10244079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The new covenant. Annison MH Mich Health Hosp; 2002; 38(4):60-1. PubMed ID: 12141112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 99(1):330-43. PubMed ID: 11655827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sixth Circuit: individual cannot sue HHS to enforce Hill-Burton obligations. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jun; 8(13):8-9. PubMed ID: 10272364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools. McConnell MW Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is it federal aid?...or federal control! Gordon HC Oper Dent; 1976; 1(3):122. PubMed ID: 1072903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion. Mahoney HM America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues. Reitler EG Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HHS begins enforcing equal access to healthcare; threatens fund cuts. Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1980 Jun; 10(6):17. PubMed ID: 10247366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance from HEW: proposed rules. Fed Regist; 1979 Sep; 44(186):22108-20. PubMed ID: 10243424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice. Berg P Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Inmate abortion funding in California: a constitutional analysis. Vukson TM Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):107-26. PubMed ID: 11655886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion, Medicaid, and the Constitution. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 54(1):120-60. PubMed ID: 11663947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis of the 1st amendment rights of Catholic health facilities. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1974 Feb; 55(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 4811520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium. Chopko ME Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]