These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8307246)

  • 1. Ambient noise levels in audiometric test rooms used for clinical audiometry.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):414-22. PubMed ID: 8307246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ambient noise levels in industrial audiometric test rooms.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 May; 55(5):433-7. PubMed ID: 8209846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ANSI update: maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms.
    Frank T
    Am J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 9(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 10943020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards.
    Lankford JE; Perrone DC; Thunder TD
    AAOHN J; 1999 Apr; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration matters: II. Measurement of ambient noise in test rooms/areas.
    Chung K
    J Commun Disord; 2023; 101():106293. PubMed ID: 36580859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mobile soundproof booth for audiometric industrial testing].
    Grzesik J; Kowalska H; Pawlas K
    Med Pr; 1977; 28(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 865269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Acoustic Test Environment for Hearing Testing.
    Margolis RH; Madsen B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Oct; 26(9):784-91. PubMed ID: 26415972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 1/3 octave-band noise generator for sound-field audiometric measurements.
    Lippmann R; Adams D
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Feb; 47(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 7176581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Background noise in rooms used for pure-tone audiometry in disability assessment.
    Robinson DW
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Feb; 26(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 1586848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise attenuation characteristics of the MX-41/AR and the Telephonics circumaural audiometric headsets.
    Bienvenue GR; Michael PL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 721665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambient Noise in Candidate Rooms for User-Operated Audiometry.
    Sidiras C; Nielsen J; Sørensen CB; Schmidt JH; Pedersen RG; Pedersen ER
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Mar; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 36981546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations.
    Meinke DK; Martin WH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):26. PubMed ID: 36732250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pure-tone audiometric threshold assessment with in-ear monitoring of noise levels.
    Buckey JC; Fellows AM; Jastrzembski BG; Maro II; Moshi N; Turk M; Clavier OH; Kline-Schoder RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):783-8. PubMed ID: 23992487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise].
    Zivić L; Ignjatović S; Terzić N; Jakovljević VLj; Zivić D; Djonović N
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Mar; 67(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20361699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.