BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8307502)

  • 21. Treatment, results and prognostic factors in stage I and II sarcomas of the corpus uteri.
    Vongtama V; Karlen JR; Piver SM; Tsukada Y; Moore RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Jan; 126(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 175673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of primary site on outcomes in leiomyosarcoma: a review of clinicopathologic differences between uterine and extrauterine disease.
    Farid M; Ong WS; Tan MH; Foo LS; Lim YK; Chia WK; Soh LT; Poon D; Lee MJ; Ho ZC; Jeevan R; Chin F; Teo M; Quek R
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 22772425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prognostic parameters for survival of patients with malignant mesenchymal tumors of the uterus.
    Nola M; Babić D; Ilić J; Marusić M; Uzarević B; Petrovecki M; Sabioncello A; Kovac D; Jukić S
    Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(12):2543-50. PubMed ID: 8952563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Flow cytometric analysis of uterine sarcoma: ploidy and S-phase rate as prognostic indicators.
    Malmström H; Schmidt H; Persson PG; Carstensen J; Nordenskjöld B; Simonsen E
    Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Feb; 44(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 1544595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of current staging systems and a novel staging system for uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Giuntoli RL; Lessard-Anderson CR; Gerardi MA; Kushnir CL; Cliby WA; Metzinger DS; Gostout BS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):869-76. PubMed ID: 23669444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of patients with uterine sarcoma: analysis of 127 patients at a single institution, 1989-2007.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 134(12):1277-87. PubMed ID: 18506484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flow cytometric analysis of uterine sarcomas.
    Lennart K; Lennart B; Ulf S; Bernard T
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Dec; 55(3 Pt 1):339-42. PubMed ID: 7835771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients.
    Abeler VM; Røyne O; Thoresen S; Danielsen HE; Nesland JM; Kristensen GB
    Histopathology; 2009 Feb; 54(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 19236512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Uterine sarcomas: clinical and histopathological aspects. Report on 15 cases].
    Leung F; Terzibachian JJ; Aouar Z; Govyadovskiy A; Lassabe C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 18538624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Histopathological, clinical and prognostic aspects of smooth-muscle tumors of the uterus (cellular myoma, leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma)].
    De Giacomo G; Palla G; Paparatti L; Villani L; Moneta E
    Minerva Ginecol; 1988 Feb; 40(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 3399122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Postoperative radiotherapy of uterine sarcoma: a multicentric retrospective study].
    Champetier C; Hannoun-Levi JM; Resbeut M; Azria D; Salem N; Tessier E; Ellis S; Cowen D;
    Cancer Radiother; 2011 Apr; 15(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 20674447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prospective analysis of DNA ploidy, proliferative index and epidermal growth factor receptor as prognostic factors for pretreated uterine cancer.
    Nagai N; Oshita T; Fujii T; Kioka H; Katsube Y; Ohama K
    Oncol Rep; 2000; 7(3):551-9. PubMed ID: 10767367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distinctive outcome in patients with non-uterine and uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Lamm W; Natter C; Schur S; Köstler WJ; Reinthaller A; Krainer M; Grimm C; Horvath R; Amann G; Funovics P; Brodowicz T; Polterauer S
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Dec; 14():981. PubMed ID: 25523155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uterine sarcomas.
    Mbatani N; Olawaiye AB; Prat J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 143 Suppl 2():51-58. PubMed ID: 30306577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sarcomas of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 119 patients.
    Kahanpää KV; Wahlström T; Gröhn P; Heinonen E; Nieminen U; Widholm O
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 67(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 3945454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prognostic importance of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in the uterine sarcoma.
    Arita S; Kikkawa F; Kajiyama H; Shibata K; Kawai M; Mizuno K; Nagasaka T; Ino K; Nomura S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 15823121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prognostic factors and outcome in women with uterine sarcoma.
    Denschlag D; Masoud I; Stanimir G; Gilbert L
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 33(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 17174517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Uterine sarcoma: prognostic factors and treatment evaluation.
    Naaman Y; Shveiky D; Ben-Shachar I; Shushan A; Mejia-Gomez J; Benshushan A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2011 Feb; 13(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 21443030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Uterine sarcoma-current management and experience from a regional cancer centre in North India.
    Biswas A; Patel F; Kumar P; Srinivasan R; Bera A; Sharma SC; Rajwanshi A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):873-82. PubMed ID: 23580012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Uterine sarcomas: a clinicopathologic study.
    Chiara S; Foglia G; Odicino F; Graziani A; Conte PF; Ragni N; Fulcheri E; Pescetto G
    Oncology; 1988; 45(6):428-33. PubMed ID: 3186152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.