BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8307504)

  • 21. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access.
    Merrell SW; Peatross BG; Grossman MD; Sullivan JJ; Harker WG
    West J Med; 1994 Jan; 160(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8128698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
    Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Long term central venous catheterization revisited].
    Palermo S; Campolucci A; Capozza F; Cammardella MP; Balestrero A; Ferrando F; Basta P; Launo C
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):451-6. PubMed ID: 8677035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of venous access device wound complications in patients undergoing paclitaxel chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
    Boulay RM; Olt GJ; Podczaski ES
    Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Aug; 70(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 9740701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.
    Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K
    Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Management of end-stage central venous access in children referred for possible small bowel transplantation.
    Rodrigues AF; van Mourik ID; Sharif K; Barron DJ; de Giovanni JV; Bennett J; Bromley P; Protheroe S; John P; de Ville de Goyet J; Beath SV
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2006 Apr; 42(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 16641582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
    Unal AE; Bayar S; Arat M; Ilhan O
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct cephalic vein cannulation for safe subclavian access.
    Perry EP; Nash JR; Klidjian AM
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1990 Aug; 35(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 2121966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cytotoxic therapy. Role of durable venous access.
    Rao VK; Charak BS; Giri NK; Banavali SD; Pai SK; Pai VR; Nadkarni KS; Kurkure PA; Saikia TK; Gopal R
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1990 Dec; 38(12):897-9. PubMed ID: 2096122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasound-guided insertion of subclavian venous access ports.
    Brooks AJ; Alfredson M; Pettigrew B; Morris DL
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Jan; 87(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 15720903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.
    Warner BW; Haygood MM; Davies SL; Hennies GA
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8696545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The timing and sequence of multiple device-related complications in patients with long-term indwelling Groshong catheters.
    Tolar B; Gould JR
    Cancer; 1996 Sep; 78(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 8826955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
    Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results].
    Kluge A; Stroh H; Wagner D; Rauber K
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
    Koonings PP; Given FT
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective study of untunnelled subclavian vein catheters in hematooncology patients.
    Huijgens PC; Strack van Schijndel R; Kampman I; Ossenkoppele GJ; Klomp-Gerringa M; van der Putten E
    Neth J Med; 1991 Apr; 38(3-4):153-8. PubMed ID: 1881503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peripherally inserted central catheters in children.
    Chait PG; Ingram J; Phillips-Gordon C; Farrell H; Kuhn C
    Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 7480755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Placement of hemodialysis catheters through stenotic or occluded central thoracic veins.
    Haller C; Déglise S; Saucy F; Mathieu C; Haesler E; Doenz F; Corpataux JM; Qanadli SD
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jul; 32(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 19449059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Groshong versus Hickman catheters.
    Pasquale MD; Campbell JM; Magnant CM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 May; 174(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 1570619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of the femoral vein as insertion site for tunneled hemodialysis catheters.
    Falk A
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 17327554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.