These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8307717)

  • 1. Evaluation of an enhanced digital film-duplication system by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Hoffmann KR; MacMahon H; Doi K; Metz CE; Yao L; Abe K
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Dec; 28(12):1134-8. PubMed ID: 8307717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved visualization of stimulated nodules by adaptive enhancement of digital chest radiography.
    Kim JH; Im JG; Han MC; Min BG; Lee CW
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Oct; 1(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9419471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
    Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs using a commercial computer-aided diagnosis system.
    Kakeda S; Moriya J; Sato H; Aoki T; Watanabe H; Nakata H; Oda N; Katsuragawa S; Yamamoto K; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Feb; 182(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 14736690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of lung nodules on digital chest radiographs: potential usefulness of a new contralateral subtraction technique.
    Tsukuda S; Heshiki A; Katsuragawa S; Li Q; MacMahon H; Doi K
    Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 11930067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: comparison with computed radiography.
    Yoshimura H; Xu XW; Doi K; MacMahon H; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Montner SM
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 8455513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of computerized method for lung nodule detection in digital chest radiographs using temporal subtraction images.
    Aoki T; Oda N; Yamashita Y; Yamamoto K; Korogi Y
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):1000-5. PubMed ID: 21718956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.
    Schaefer CM; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Wiesmann W; Haubitz B; Meschede A; Reichelt S; Schirg E; Stender HS; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 1609106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detectability of lung nodules using flat panel detector with dual energy subtraction by two shot method: evaluation by ROC method.
    Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Yoshimoto M; Mochizuki T; Murase K
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17386991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Jinnnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Kawanami S; Okamoto T; Sasaki M; Honda H
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 25168020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quantitative analysis of clinical usefulness of CRT monitor diagnosis by using previous and current chest images with simulated lung nodules].
    Sasaki Y; Katsuragawa S; Yoneda Y; Takeda S; Yanagisawa T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 56(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 8692651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization.
    Li F; Hara T; Shiraishi J; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41. PubMed ID: 21512042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance.
    Sherrier RH; Chiles C; Wilkinson WE; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 3336719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.