These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8308047)

  • 1. An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1993 Dec; 26(12):1429-38. PubMed ID: 8308047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomechanical assessment and model of axial twisting in the thoracolumbar spine.
    Marras WS; Granata KP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1440-51. PubMed ID: 8623063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A CAE (computer aided engineering) approach to dynamic whole body modeling--the forces iin the lumbar spine in asymmetrical lifting].
    Deuretzbacher G; Rehder U
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1995 Apr; 40(4):93-8. PubMed ID: 7772711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of trunk muscle coactivity on dynamic spinal loads.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Apr; 20(8):913-9. PubMed ID: 7644956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.
    Abdoli-E M; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 18093709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing of a biomechanical model of the lumbar muscle force distribution using quasi-static loading exercises.
    Ladin Z; Neff KM
    J Biomech Eng; 1992 Nov; 114(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 1487895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Describing the active region boundary of EMG-assisted biomechanical models of the low back.
    Ning X; Jin S; Mirka GA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jun; 27(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 22169592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A three-dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine: II. Model validation.
    Marras WS; Sommerich CM
    Hum Factors; 1991 Apr; 33(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 1860701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexion relaxation during lifting: implications for torque production by muscle activity and tissue strain at the lumbo-sacral joint.
    Toussaint HM; de Winter AF; de Haas Y; de Looze MP; Van Dieën JH; Kingma I
    J Biomech; 1995 Feb; 28(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 7896862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach.
    Cholewicki J; McGill SM; Norman RW
    J Biomech; 1995 Mar; 28(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 7730390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2637-48. PubMed ID: 16319750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics, and kinetics during walking.
    Callaghan JP; Patla AE; McGill SM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Mar; 14(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 10619108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biologically-assisted curved muscle model of the lumbar spine: Model validation.
    Hwang J; Knapik GG; Dufour JS; Best TM; Khan SN; Mendel E; Marras WS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Aug; 37():153-159. PubMed ID: 27484459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An EMG-assisted modeling approach to assess passive lumbar tissue loading in vivo during trunk bending.
    Ning X
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2017 Oct; 36():1-7. PubMed ID: 28633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.