BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8308473)

  • 1. Management of research misconduct--in practice.
    Wells FO
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8308473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time to face up to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention and management of fraud--in theory.
    Riis P
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8308472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
    Williams N
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fraud in drug research.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1992 Aug; 340(8817):477-8. PubMed ID: 11643085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
    Wells F
    Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Conduct unbecoming--the MRC's approach.
    Evans I
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1728-9. PubMed ID: 9652921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
    Chantler C; Chantler S
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Medical Research Council's approach to allegations of scientific misconduct.
    Evans I
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 11273442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's new in research ethics.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; No. 122():13-8. PubMed ID: 11654863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
    Farthing MJ
    Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing with deception.
    Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9005):843. PubMed ID: 8622383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. German task force outraged by changes to science fraud report.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):3. PubMed ID: 11780073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Honest advice from Denmark.
    Riis P
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1733. PubMed ID: 9652924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
    Wells F
    Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Will the UK cope?
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
    Farthing MJ
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research fraud: discouraging the others.
    Lock S
    BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GMC gets tough with fraudulent doctors.
    Dillner L
    BMJ; 1991 Dec; 303(6816):1493. PubMed ID: 11642956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.