These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8308473)

  • 21. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.
    Rennie D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Doctors propose panel on research misconduct.
    Klarreich E
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):442. PubMed ID: 11586312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Procedure for investigation of research misconduct--active treatment or sham intervention?
    Wilmshurst P
    J R Soc Med; 2008 Nov; 101(11):524-5. PubMed ID: 19029346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scientific misconduct.
    Masters KJ
    JAMA; 1993 Jun 23-30; 269(24):3105; author reply 3105-6. PubMed ID: 8505807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alternative dispute resolution and research misconduct.
    Guenin LM
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 9111964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Call for research misconduct agency.
    White C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The secret world of animal experiments.
    Hampson J
    New Sci; 1992 Apr; 134(1816):24-7. PubMed ID: 11656118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consultant struck off over research fraud.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):205. PubMed ID: 11644983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
    Verma BL; Shukla GD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.
    Buzzelli DE
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):584-5, 647-8. PubMed ID: 8430300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research misconduct: a brief history and a comparison.
    Lock S
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8308474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Research ban on fraudulent doctor.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8836):45. PubMed ID: 11643225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research misconduct.
    Jones R
    Fam Pract; 2002 Apr; 19(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 11906974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. UK declaration made on research misconduct.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1623. PubMed ID: 11658054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Research Councils UK issues tougher guidelines on research conduct.
    Watts G
    BMJ; 2013 Mar; 346():f1565. PubMed ID: 23476059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A European perspective in regulating clinical research.
    Byrne P
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6693):218. PubMed ID: 2504373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scientific misconduct--does it exist?
    Böttiger LE
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 8308471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.