These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8308493)

  • 1. Context-specificity of target versus feature inhibition in a feature-negative discrimination.
    Bouton ME; Nelson JB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 8308493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):311-28. PubMed ID: 2794868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Occasion-setting training renders stimuli more similar: acquired equivalence between the targets of feature-positive discriminations.
    Bonardi C; Hall G
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1994 Feb; 47(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 8165326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings.
    Hall G; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1979 Jan; 5(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 528877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A role for stimulus generalization in conditional discrimination learning.
    Wilson PN; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1989 Aug; 41(3):243-73. PubMed ID: 2798927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.
    Bueno JL; Holland PC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):132-47. PubMed ID: 18657599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of retention interval on latent inhibition and perceptual learning.
    Killcross AS; Kiernan MJ; Dwyer D; Westbrook RF
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 Feb; 51(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 9532962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between the determinants of performance in serial feature-positive discriminations.
    Ross RT
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Oct; 9(4):349-73. PubMed ID: 6644243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of reinforcement of an inhibitory feature after serial and simultaneous feature negative discrimination training.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):461-75. PubMed ID: 6491607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Configural associations in discrimination learning.
    Pearce JM; Wilson PN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jul; 16(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 2398336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective transfer of responding in conditional discriminations.
    Wilson PN; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 Feb; 42(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 2326493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing excitatory backward and forward conditioning.
    Chang RC; Stout S; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 14690847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A configural analysis for feature-negative discrimination learning.
    Wilson PN; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 1619394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between the elements of a bivalent compound stimulus.
    Cunningham CL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):425-36. PubMed ID: 7288371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local time horizons in Pavlovian learning.
    Barnet RC; Grahame NJ; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Jul; 19(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 8340767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of an extinguished CS on competition with another CS.
    Bills CH; Dopheide M; Pineño O; Schachtman TR
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 16457968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing during inhibitory conditioning.
    Williams DA; Johns KW; Brindas M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 18426306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
    Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posttraining but not pretraining lesions of the hippocampus interfere with feature-negative discrimination of fear-potentiated startle.
    Heldt SA; Coover GD; Falls WA
    Hippocampus; 2002; 12(6):774-86. PubMed ID: 12542229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What starts an internal clock?
    Roberts S; Holder MD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Jul; 10(3):273-96. PubMed ID: 6747553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.