These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8308494)

  • 1. Kinetics of matching.
    Mark TA; Gallistel CR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 8308494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anticipation of rewarding electrical brain stimulation evokes ultrasonic vocalization in rats.
    Burgdorf J; Knutson B; Panksepp J
    Behav Neurosci; 2000 Apr; 114(2):320-7. PubMed ID: 10832793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal generalization accounts for response resurgence in the peak procedure.
    Sanabria F; Killeen PR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):126-41. PubMed ID: 17141981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interval time-place learning by rats: varying reinforcement contingencies.
    Thorpe CM; Wilkie DM
    Behav Processes; 2005 Sep; 70(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 16112509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extinction after regular and irregular reward schedules in the infant rat: influence of age and training duration.
    Lilliquist MW; Nair HP; Gonzalez-Lima F; Amsel A
    Dev Psychobiol; 1999 Jan; 34(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 9919433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.
    Kheramin S; Body S; Herrera FM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 15474659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diabetic type II Goto-Kakizaki rats show progressively decreasing exploratory activity and learning impairments in fixed and progressive ratios of a lever-press task.
    Moreira T; Malec E; Ostenson CG; Efendic S; Liljequist S
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 180(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 17408764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.
    Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intermittent rewards raise self-stimulation thresholds.
    Fouriezos G; Emdin K; Beaudoin L
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Jan; 74(1-2):57-64. PubMed ID: 8851915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The rat approximates an ideal detector of changes in rates of reward: implications for the law of effect.
    Gallistel CR; Mark TA; King AP; Latham PE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Oct; 27(4):354-72. PubMed ID: 11676086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-stimulating rats combine subjective reward magnitude and subjective reward rate multiplicatively.
    Leon MI; Gallistel CR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Jul; 24(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 12150166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foraging for brain stimulation: toward a neurobiology of computation.
    Gallistel CR
    Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):151-70. PubMed ID: 8039358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matching and maximization on dependent concurrent variable-ratio schedules.
    Krauth J; Hemicker D
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1988; 139(4):255-69. PubMed ID: 3408342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory.
    Mace FC; McCurdy B; Quigley EA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 2373655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frontal cortex lesions and fixed-interval acquisition in the rat.
    Schmitz N; Foshee DP
    Psychol Rep; 1971 Oct; 29(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 5126748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus control in multiple temporal discriminations.
    Caetano MS; Guilhardi P; Church RM
    Learn Behav; 2012 Dec; 40(4):520-9. PubMed ID: 22447102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic nonlinearities in the memory representation of time.
    Crystal JD; Church RM; Broadbent HA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1997 Jul; 23(3):267-82. PubMed ID: 9206024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.