116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8310153)
21. The magnitude of treatment field set-up parameter correction in radiation therapy.
Gluhchev G
Radiother Oncol; 1998 Jul; 48(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 9756175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stereographic targeting in prostate radiotherapy: speed and precision by daily automatic positioning corrections using kilovoltage/megavoltage image pairs.
Mutanga TF; de Boer HC; van der Wielen GJ; Wentzler D; Barnhoorn J; Incrocci L; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1074-83. PubMed ID: 18207657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Treatment accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.
Kumar S; Burke K; Nalder C; Jarrett P; Mubata C; A'hern R; Humphreys M; Bidmead M; Brada M
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jan; 74(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15683670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cumulative sum method in nonzero fixed action level setup correction strategy: an application of statistical process control for targeted prostate radiotherapy.
Ung NM; Wee L
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2746-53. PubMed ID: 22559645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The cumulative verification image analysis tool for offline evaluation of portal images.
Wong J; Yan D; Michalski J; Graham M; Halverson K; Harms W; Purdy J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1301-10. PubMed ID: 7493855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data.
Gilhuijs KG; van de Ven PJ; van Herk M
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 8815382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
Mubata CD; Bidmead AM; Ellingham LM; Thompson V; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
Jarry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [PIV: a computer-aided portal image verification system].
Fu W; Zhang H; Wu J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 19(4):664-6. PubMed ID: 12561374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of electronic portal imaging in tangential breast irradiation: a prospective study.
Lirette A; Pouliot J; Aubin M; Larochelle M
Radiother Oncol; 1995 Dec; 37(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 8746594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results.
Topolnjak R; Sonke JJ; Nijkamp J; Rasch C; Minkema D; Remeijer P; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1235-43. PubMed ID: 20472368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of monitor unit software and the application of action levels.
Georg D; Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Kjaer-Kristoffersen F; Schnekenburger B; Winkler P; Nyström H; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Nov; 85(2):306-15. PubMed ID: 17904234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Assessment of the accuracy of position in breast irradiation with isocentric technique using an electronic system to acquire portal images].
Greco C; Brambilla MG; Orecchia R
Radiol Med; 1997 Mar; 93(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 9221419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Methods for fully automated verification of patient set-up in external beam radiotherapy with polygon shaped fields.
Eilertsen K; Skretting A; Tennvassås TL
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Jun; 39(6):993-1012. PubMed ID: 15551575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of couch translational corrections to compensate for rotational and deformable target deviations in image guided radiotherapy.
Yue NJ; Kim S; Lewis BE; Jabbour S; Narra V; Goyal S; Haffty BG
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4375-85. PubMed ID: 18975683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Application of image-guided radiotherapy in external beam radiation of cancer patients].
Major T; Agoston P; Jorgo K; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2012 Dec; 56(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 23236596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Image comparison techniques for use with megavoltage imaging systems.
Evans PM; Gildersleve JQ; Morton EJ; Swindell W; Coles R; Ferraro M; Rawlings C; Xiao ZR; Dyer J
Br J Radiol; 1992 Aug; 65(776):701-9. PubMed ID: 1393398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of adaptive radiation therapy to reduce setup error: a prospective clinical study.
Yan D; Ziaja E; Jaffray D; Wong J; Brabbins D; Vicini F; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jun; 41(3):715-20. PubMed ID: 9635724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
