These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8310189)

  • 21. Statistical methods in epidemiology. v. Towards an understanding of the kappa coefficient.
    Rigby AS
    Disabil Rehabil; 2000 May; 22(8):339-44. PubMed ID: 10896093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling patterns of agreement and disagreement.
    Agresti A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1992; 1(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 1341658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.
    Feinstein AR; Cicchetti DV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 2348207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misleading Epidemiological and Statistical Evidence in the Presence of Simpson's Paradox: An Illustrative Study Using Simulated Scenarios of Observational Study Designs.
    Rojanaworarit C
    J Med Life; 2020; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 32341699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modelling covariate effects in observer agreement studies: the case of nominal scale agreement.
    Graham P
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 7724915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data.
    Uter W; Schnuch A; Gefeller O;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Aug; 51(2):47-56. PubMed ID: 15373843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures.
    Elzinga M; Segers M; Siebenga J; Heilbron E; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Bakker F
    Injury; 2012 Apr; 43(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 21645896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determining agreement using rater characteristics.
    Davis MD; Joseph J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(4):619-30. PubMed ID: 26098198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chance-corrected measures of the validity of a binary diagnostic test.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Jun; 47(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 7722575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity and specificity-like measures of the validity of a diagnostic test that are corrected for chance agreement.
    Coughlin SS; Pickle LW
    Epidemiology; 1992 Mar; 3(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 1576224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using association models to analyse agreement data: two examples.
    Becker MP
    Stat Med; 1989 Oct; 8(10):1199-207. PubMed ID: 2814069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Some common errors of experimental design, interpretation and inference in agreement studies.
    Erdmann TP; De Mast J; Warrens MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):920-35. PubMed ID: 22232301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement.
    Uebersax JS; Grove WM
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):823-35. PubMed ID: 10798855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Summary measures of agreement and association between many raters' ordinal classifications.
    Mitani AA; Freer PE; Nelson KP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):677-685.e4. PubMed ID: 29029991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability of the manual ability classification system for children with cerebral palsy.
    Morris C; Kurinczuk JJ; Fitzpatrick R; Rosenbaum PL
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2006 Dec; 48(12):950-3. PubMed ID: 17109781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Global and partial agreement among several observers.
    Rogel A; Boëlle PY; Mary JY
    Stat Med; 1998 Feb; 17(4):489-501. PubMed ID: 9496724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The agreement chart.
    Bangdiwala SI; Shankar V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():97. PubMed ID: 23890315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of the diagnosis of impairments in survey research in the field of chiropody.
    Van Gisbergen MJ; Dekker J; Zuijderduin W
    Disabil Rehabil; 1993; 15(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 8513160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measures of agreement: a single procedure.
    Bartko JJ
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):737-45. PubMed ID: 8023046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.