These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8310755)

  • 1. [Changes in the lumbar intervertebral disk following use of the Holmium-Yag laser--a biomechanical study].
    Castro WH; Halm H; Jerosch J; Schilgen M; Winkelmann W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(6):610-4. PubMed ID: 8310755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Changes in the lumbar disk following use of non-automated percutaneous discectomy. A biomechanical study].
    Castro WH; Jerosch J; Brinckmann P
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 1492450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD) on the biomechanics of the lumbar intervertebral disc. An experimental study.
    Castro WH; Halm H; Rondhuis J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1992; 58(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 1485502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bulging of lumbar intervertebral discs: non-contacting measurements of anatomical specimens.
    Stokes IA
    J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 2980136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device.
    Heuer F; Schmitt H; Schmidt H; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Aug; 22(7):737-44. PubMed ID: 17561321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Influence of inlay height on motion characteristics of lumbar segments in total disc replacement].
    Weisskopf M; Ohnsorge JA; Martini F; Niethard FU; Birnbaum K
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 18704840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of uniform heating on the biomechanical properties of the intervertebral disc in a porcine model.
    Wang JC; Kabo JM; Tsou PM; Halevi L; Shamie AN
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 15653086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic bulging of intervertebral discs in the degenerative lumbar spine.
    Zou J; Yang H; Miyazaki M; Morishita Y; Wei F; McGovern S; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2545-50. PubMed ID: 19841611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the effects of automated percutaneous diskectomy and conventional diskectomy on intradiscal pressure, disk geometry, and stiffness.
    Shea M; Takeuchi TY; Wittenberg RH; White AA; Hayes WC
    J Spinal Disord; 1994 Aug; 7(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 7949699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker.
    Shim CS; Park SW; Lee SH; Lim TJ; Chun K; Kim DH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E820-7. PubMed ID: 18923305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relation between intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber associated strains for simple and complex loading.
    Heuer F; Schmidt H; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):1086-94. PubMed ID: 18187139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.
    Ferrara L; Triano JJ; Sohn MJ; Song E; Lee DD
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16153584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI evaluation of lumbar spine flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals.
    Edmondston SJ; Song S; Bricknell RV; Davies PA; Fersum K; Humphries P; Wickenden D; Singer KP
    Man Ther; 2000 Aug; 5(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 11034886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.