115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8310913)
1. Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection.
Kreager JA; Kornguth PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 8310913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C
Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast.
Ikeda DM; Sickles EA
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 3406393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.
Pearson KL; Sickles EA; Frankel SD; Leung JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 10701619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Film-screen mammography: comparison of views.
Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Gold RH; Jahanshahi R
J Natl Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 81(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 2738948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of contralateral breast cancer by mammography in women with previous breast cancer and the impact of endocrine therapy.
Mason BH; Holdaway IM; Benton NM; Benson-Cooper DM; Hadden WE; Kay RG
N Z Med J; 1993 Feb; 106(949):23-5. PubMed ID: 8464582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.
Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3490749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor location and detectability in mammographic screening.
Schmitt EL; Threatt B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Oct; 139(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 6981939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast radiography using the oblique projection.
Bassett LW; Gold RH
Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):585-7. PubMed ID: 6622708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening.
Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of the routine magnification view after breast conservation therapy for carcinoma.
DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Shaffer K; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Rolfs AT
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):341-3. PubMed ID: 8596828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Efficiency and practicability of the oblique mediolateral view as one-view mammography (author's transl)].
Hüppe JR; Schneider HJ
Radiologe; 1977 May; 17(5):211-2. PubMed ID: 877268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods.
Kalbhen CL; McGill JJ; Fendley PM; Corrigan KW; Angelats J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1643-9. PubMed ID: 10584814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Updated relevance of mammographic screening modalities in women previously treated with chest irradiation for Hodgkin disease.
Colin C; de Vathaire F; Noël A; Charlot M; Devic C; Foray N; Valette PJ
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):669-76. PubMed ID: 23175541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
