These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8310913)

  • 21. Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views.
    Anttinen I; Pamilo M; Roiha M; Soiva M; Suramo I
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 2591390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcome of mammography examination in asymptomatic women.
    Kolade-Yunusa HO; Itanyi UD
    Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 33727513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Recent improvement of mammographic diagnosis].
    Endo T
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 8709933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer.
    Kaas R; Hart AA; Besnard AP; Peterse JL; Rutgers EJ
    Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 11136324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of breast dose and the factors affecting breast dose in screen-film mammography.
    Ozdemir A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Sep; 13(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 17846987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of combined film-screen/xeromammography: preliminary report.
    Pagani JJ; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Benedetti J; Arndt RD; Linsman J; Scanlan RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Jul; 135(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 6771979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
    Brnić Z; Hebrang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. One-view versus two-view mammography in baseline screening for breast cancer: a review.
    van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):971-6. PubMed ID: 1450833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patients: should the mastectomy site be imaged?
    Fajardo LL; Roberts CC; Hunt KR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):953-5. PubMed ID: 8273633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Wald NJ; Murphy P; Major P; Parkes C; Townsend J; Frost C
    BMJ; 1995 Nov; 311(7014):1189-93. PubMed ID: 7488893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selective use of the oblique projection in mammography.
    Hall FM; Berenberg AL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Sep; 131(3):465-8. PubMed ID: 98991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Association and Prediction Utilizing Craniocaudal and Mediolateral Oblique View Digital Mammography and Long-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Chen S; Tamimi RM; Colditz GA; Jiang S
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2023 Sep; 16(9):531-537. PubMed ID: 37428020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incident screening cancers detected with a second mammographic view: pathological and radiological features.
    Given-Wilson RM; Blanks RG
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Nov; 54(11):724-35. PubMed ID: 10580762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unilateral breast cancer: screening of contralateral breast by using preoperative MR imaging reduces incidence of metachronous cancer.
    Kim JY; Cho N; Koo HR; Yi A; Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Han W; Moon HG; Im SA; Noh DY; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23329656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The value of the second view in screening mammography.
    Warren RM; Duffy SW; Bashir S
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):105-8. PubMed ID: 8785635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Metachronous tumors of the breast. Mammographic findings].
    Tella S; Occhiato R; Speziale AM; Poggi R; Grasso F; Frasca F; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 1994 Mar; 87(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 8146360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view.
    Duffy SW; Nagtegaal ID; Astley SM; Gillan MG; McGee MA; Boggis CR; Wilson M; Beetles UM; Griffiths MA; Jain AK; Johnson J; Roberts R; Deans H; Duncan KA; Iyengar G; Griffiths PM; Warwick J; Cuzick J; Gilbert FJ
    Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(4):R64. PubMed ID: 18651965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mammographic diagnosis based on oblique projection. Personal experience].
    Gozzi G; Vidali C; Polonio G; Cressa C; Sabella M
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 3375480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Early detection of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography].
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Kondo H; Kuroda R
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Jun; 21 Suppl 2():158-63. PubMed ID: 8037479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wires should not be used routinely on skin scars for mammograms after breast-conserving surgery.
    Proulx GM; Heller B; Stomper PC
    Am Surg; 2001 Feb; 67(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 11243546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.