2017 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8310918)
1. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of the brain: comparison of gradient-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.
Pui MH; Fok EC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 7677001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved contrast of enhancing brain lesions using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging.
Melhem ER; Guidone PL; Jara H; Yucel EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):1091-5. PubMed ID: 9124121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced FMPSPGR of the pancreas: impact on diagnostic performance.
Göhde SC; Toth J; Krestin GP; Debatin JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):689-96. PubMed ID: 9057517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Sigeti JS; Foo TK
Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 8430191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences.
Barentsz JO; Jager G; Mugler JP; Oosterhof G; Peters H; van Erning LT; Ruijs SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7998522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo and spin-echo T1-weighted fat-suppressed techniques in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.
Zeng MS; Yan FH; Zhou KR; Chen ZW; Sun JZ; Chen CZ; Shi WB
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2002 May; 1(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 14612288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography.
Guibaud L; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M; Barkun AN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):847-50. PubMed ID: 8092021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [MRI cholangiography with rapid spin-echo technique: prospective evaluation of 20 patients].
Rondeau Y; Soyer P; Meduri B; Spelle L; Gouhiri M; Aubert A; Scherrer A; Rymer R
J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 79(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 9757232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment of vascular invasion with high-field MR imaging and a phased-array coil.
Sironi S; De Cobelli F; Zerbi A; Angeli E; Balzano G; Taccagni G; Di Carlo V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Oct; 167(4):997-1001. PubMed ID: 8819400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Barone RM; Lacey C; Sigeti JS; Alzate GD; Sebrechts CP
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-breath-hold fast spin-echo versus breath-hold fast spin-echo and spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR imaging in the detection of hepatic tumors: correlation with surgical findings.
Soyer P; Gouhiri M; Rondeau Y; Spelle L; Mosnier H; Scherrer A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1199-204. PubMed ID: 9129411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
