These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8311038)

  • 1. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants.
    Doppel DM; Damon WM; Joondeph DR; Little RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Feb; 105(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 8311038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average surface remodeling of the maxillary base and the orbital floor in female subjects from 8 to 25 years. An implant study.
    Iseri H; Solow B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 7817961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change.
    Nielsen IL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 May; 95(5):422-31. PubMed ID: 2718972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 2. Masking of remodeling effects when an "anatomical" method of superimposition is used in the absence of metallic implants.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Ben-Bassat Y; West EE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jun; 91(6):463-74. PubMed ID: 3473926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Growth and development of the maxillary complex].
    Björk A; Skieller V
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1984; 16(1):9-52. PubMed ID: 6589211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity of superimposing oblique cephalometric radiographs to assess tooth movement: an implant study.
    Sakima MT; Sakima CG; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 15356499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 7977186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 19524831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Partitioning the components of maxillary tooth displacement by the comparison of data from three cephalometric superimpositions.
    Baumrind S; Ben-Bassat Y; Bravo LA; Curry S; Korn EL
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(2):111-24. PubMed ID: 8712489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural reference structures for three-dimensional maxillary regional superimposition in growing patients.
    Fan Y; Han B; Zhang Y; Guo Y; Li W; Chen H; Meng C; Penington A; Schneider P; Pei Y; Chen G; Xu T
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Sep; 23(1):655. PubMed ID: 37684645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 1. A description of osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Ben-Bassat Y; West EE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jan; 91(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 3467578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Natural reference structures in the human maxilla: a systematic search in children with tantalum implants.
    Springate S
    J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 42(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25808379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing of palate repair affecting growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Xu X; Zheng Q; Lu D; Huang N; Li J; Li S; Wang Y; Shi B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e358-62. PubMed ID: 22484231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Craniofacial growth in cleidocranial dysplasia--a roentgencephalometric study.
    Jensen BL; Kreiborg S
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1995; 15(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 7601912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth displacement of the maxilla in girls studied by the implant method.
    Iseri H; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 12(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 2086259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric superimpositions.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):967-76. PubMed ID: 18947269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of general facial growth, maxillary and mandibular growth and treatment changes ("Structural analysis").
    Nielsen IL
    Int Orthod; 2011 Dec; 9(4):388-409. PubMed ID: 22032962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.