These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 831165)

  • 1. The significance of age in the colposcopic evaluation of women with atypical apanicolaou smears.
    Shingleton HM; Partridge EE; Austin JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jan; 49(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 831165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Necessity for endocervical curettage in elderly women undergoing colposcopy.
    Dinh TA; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Dillard EA
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):621-4. PubMed ID: 2810244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
    Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
    Andrews S; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):751-3. PubMed ID: 2704502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
    Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and histological significance of atypical glandular cell on Pap smear.
    Behtash N; Nazari Z; Fakhrejahani F; Khafaf A; Azar EG
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 17261100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy.
    Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The "unsatisfactory" colposcopic examination.
    Rochelson B; Krumholz BA
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 6834353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
    Kohan S; Noumoff J; Beckman EM; Morris M; Weiner E; Douglas GW
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 4009560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
    Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervicography for evaluating the "atypical" Papanicolaou smear.
    August N
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aggressive evaluation for atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
    Lindheim SR; Smith-Nguyen G
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):971-3. PubMed ID: 2246766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
    Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
    Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications.
    Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.