These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8311936)

  • 1. Magnetoencephalograms confirm a hemispheric difference in responses to auditory stimuli--verbal stimuli elicit a stronger response in the left temporal lobe.
    Biosens Bioelectron; 1993; 8(9-10):vii-ix. PubMed ID: 8311936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human neuromagnetic steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones, speech, and music.
    Lamminmäki S; Parkkonen L; Hari R
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 24603544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synchrony of audio-visual speech stimuli modulates left superior temporal sulcus.
    Balk MH; Ojanen V; Pekkola J; Autti T; Sams M; Jääskeläinen IP
    Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(12):822-6. PubMed ID: 20588202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling for individual differences in fMRI brain activation to tones, syllables, and words.
    Rimol LM; Specht K; Hugdahl K
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 16343948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Song and speech: brain regions involved with perception and covert production.
    Callan DE; Tsytsarev V; Hanakawa T; Callan AM; Katsuhara M; Fukuyama H; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1327-42. PubMed ID: 16546406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neuromagnetic mismatch field (MMF) dependence on the auditory temporal integration window and the existence of categorical boundaries: comparisons between dissyllabic words and their equivalent tones.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ohta K; Matsushima E; Ferrari P; Scovel T
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1232():155-62. PubMed ID: 18671951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left-hemisphere dominance for processing of vowels: a whole-scalp neuromagnetic study.
    Gootjes L; Raij T; Salmelin R; Hari R
    Neuroreport; 1999 Sep; 10(14):2987-91. PubMed ID: 10549810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuromagnetic responses to vowels vs. tones reveal hemispheric lateralization.
    Kirveskari E; Salmelin R; Hari R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 16403672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory neuroscience: is speech special?
    Moore DR
    Curr Biol; 2000 May; 10(10):R362-4. PubMed ID: 10837214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociated expressive and receptive language functions on magnetoencephalography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and amobarbital studies. Case report and review of the literature.
    Kamada K; Takeuchi F; Kuriki S; Todo T; Morita A; Sawamura Y
    J Neurosurg; 2006 Apr; 104(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 16619665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention modulates hemispheric differences in functional connectivity: evidence from MEG recordings.
    Gootjes L; Bouma A; Van Strien JW; Scheltens P; Stam CJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 16253520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple magnetoencephalographic auditory paradigm may aid in confirming left-hemispheric language dominance in epilepsy patients.
    Wilenius J; Lehtinen H; Paetau R; Salmelin R; Kirveskari E
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200073. PubMed ID: 29966017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right rolandic activation during speech perception in stutterers: a MEG study.
    Biermann-Ruben K; Salmelin R; Schnitzler A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 15808980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributions of sensory input, auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing.
    Giraud AL; Kell C; Thierfelder C; Sterzer P; Russ MO; Preibisch C; Kleinschmidt A
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Mar; 14(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 14754865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course of multisensory interactions during audiovisual speech perception in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Möttönen R; Schürmann M; Sams M
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Jun; 363(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 15172096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oscillatory neuromagnetic activity induced by language and non-language stimuli.
    Eulitz C; Maess B; Pantev C; Friederici AD; Feige B; Elbert T
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1996 Sep; 4(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 8883925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Activation of association auditory cortex demonstrated with functional MRI.
    Berry I; Démonet JF; Warach S; Viallard G; Boulanouar K; Franconi JM; Marc-Vergnes JP; Edelman R; Manelfe C
    Neuroimage; 1995 Sep; 2(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 9343605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.