These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8312020)

  • 1. Feasibility of developing and selecting criteria for the assessment of clinical performance.
    Johnson N
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):499-502. PubMed ID: 8312020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.
    Elwyn G; Lewis M; Evans R; Hutchings H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Sep; 55(518):690-5. PubMed ID: 16176736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consultation competence in general practice: establishing the face validity of prioritized criteria in the Leicester assessment package.
    Fraser RC; McKinley RK; Mulholland H
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Mar; 44(380):109-13. PubMed ID: 8204317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reaccreditation: the why, what and how questions.
    Stanley I; al-Shehri A
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):524-9. PubMed ID: 8312025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formal complaints against general practitioners: a study of 1000 cases.
    Owen C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Mar; 41(344):113-5. PubMed ID: 2031754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Provision of obstetric care by general practitioners in the south western region of England.
    Smith LF
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jun; 44(383):255-7. PubMed ID: 8037979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why standards?
    Acheson HW
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1978 Nov; 28(196):692-5. PubMed ID: 739471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting standards of prescribing performance in primary care: use of a consensus group of general practitioners and application of standards to practices in the north of England.
    Bateman DN; Eccles M; Campbell M; Soutter J; Roberts SJ; Smith JM
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jan; 46(402):20-5. PubMed ID: 8745847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New Zealand and United Kingdom experiences with the RAND modified Delphi approach to producing angina and heart failure criteria for quality assessment in general practice.
    Buetow SA; Coster GD
    Qual Health Care; 2000 Dec; 9(4):222-31. PubMed ID: 11101707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of care in general practice. A delphi study of indicators and methods.
    Moussa A; Bridges-Webb C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1994 Mar; 23(3):465-8, 472-3. PubMed ID: 8048881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the performance of general practitioners by the use of standardized (simulated) patients.
    Rethans JJ; Sturmans F; Drop R; van der Vleuten C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Mar; 41(344):97-9. PubMed ID: 2031767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance indicators for primary care groups. Performance of these indicators is critical.
    Cranney M; Barton S
    BMJ; 1999 Mar; 318(7186):804-5. PubMed ID: 10215385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Setting a standard for performance assessment of doctor-patient communication in general practice.
    Hobma SO; Ram PM; Muijtjens AM; Grol RP; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1244-52. PubMed ID: 15566535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making general practice fit for the 21st century.
    Jewell D
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jun; 55(515):422-3. PubMed ID: 15970064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical knowledge and education for general practice.
    Acheson HW; Henley MH
    J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap; 1984 Oct; (27):1-28. PubMed ID: 6152993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new selection system to recruit general practice registrars: preliminary findings from a validation study.
    Patterson F; Ferguson E; Norfolk T; Lane P
    BMJ; 2005 Mar; 330(7493):711-4. PubMed ID: 15790641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing case records using monitor criteria developed from consensus guidelines.
    Steven ID; Coffey GA; Burgess TA; Bishop K; Mudge P
    Aust Fam Physician; 1997 Jan; 26 Suppl 1():S18-28. PubMed ID: 9009031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General practitioners' confidence in diagnosing and managing eye conditions: a survey in south Devon.
    Featherstone PI; James C; Hall MS; Williams A
    Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Jan; 42(354):21-4. PubMed ID: 1586528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous professional development for GPs: experience from Denmark.
    Kjaer NK; Steenstrup AP; Pedersen LB; Halling A
    Postgrad Med J; 2014 Jul; 90(1065):383-7. PubMed ID: 24864203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.