These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8312021)

  • 21. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Breast, cervical and colo-rectal simultaneous mass screening program for women 50 to 69 years old in Isere].
    Garnier A; Exbrayat C; Marron J; Seigneurin D; Winckel P; Bolla M
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():59-69. PubMed ID: 10989629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.
    Orton M; Fitzpatrick R; Fuller A; Mant D; Mlynek C; Thorogood M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Aug; 41(349):320-2. PubMed ID: 1777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Have the most recent Pap smear guidelines affected GP practices?
    Wai D; Ferrier A; Collings S; Laverty C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 9479800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marrying research, clinical practice and cervical screening in Australian Aboriginal women in western New South Wales, Australia.
    Read CM; Bateson DJ
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(2):1117. PubMed ID: 19459723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Compliance with mammography screening in Israeli women: the impact of a pre-scheduled appointment and of the letter-style.
    Ore L; Hagoel L; Shifroni G; Rennert G
    Isr J Med Sci; 1997 Feb; 33(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 9254871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
    Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use and overlap of AED and general practice services by patients registered at two inner London general practices.
    Hull S; Jones IR; Moser K; Fisher J
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Sep; 48(434):1575-9. PubMed ID: 9830182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening for cervical cancer: attitudes and policies among Auckland general practitioners.
    McMaster H; Arroll B
    N Z Med J; 1992 Apr; 105(931):125-7. PubMed ID: 1560922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The health-care practices of Vietnamese-Canadian women: cultural influences on breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Donnelly TT
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Mar; 38(1):82-101. PubMed ID: 16671282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The attendance of migrant women at the national breast cancer screening in the Netherlands 1997-2008.
    Vermeer B; Van den Muijsenbergh ME
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2010 May; 19(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 20150815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical cancer screening in the Ferrara Local Health Authority catchment area.
    Bergamini M; Buriani O; Cucchi A; De Togni A; Carpanelli MC; Cervato K; Gigli F; Pizzo F; Ravasini G; Rauli G; Rizzello R; Gregorio P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Dec; 48(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 18557309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
    Corkrey R; Parkinson L; Bates L
    Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Status of preventive examinations against uterine cervix cancer in Denmark].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jespersen NB; Lindsø R; Olesen F; Poll P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1339-42. PubMed ID: 1598707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Obstacles and reticences in the screening of cancer of the cervix by the general practitioner].
    Weil O; Schaffer P
    Bull Cancer; 1994 Apr; 81(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 7703550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical screening in general practice - strategies for improving participation.
    Byrnes P; McGoldrick C; Crawford M; Peers M
    Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Mar; 36(3):183-4, 192. PubMed ID: 17339987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
    Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
    Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.