These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8313284)
1. The midwife dossier: cooperation or competition? Klein MC CMAJ; 1994 Mar; 150(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 8313284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Midwifery defined by physicians, nurses and midwives: the birth of a consensus? Blais R; Maheux B; Lambert J; Loiselle J; Gauthier N; Framarin A CMAJ; 1994 Mar; 150(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 8313288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blame and vindication in the early modern birthing chamber. McTavish L Med Hist; 2006 Oct; 50(4):447-64. PubMed ID: 17066128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Integral obstetrics impeded by history? Midwives and gynaecologists through the ages]. van der Lee N; Scheele F Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2016; 160():D621. PubMed ID: 27879181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The campaign to eliminate the midwife. Dawley K Am J Nurs; 2000 Oct; 100(10):50-6. PubMed ID: 11059319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Despite CMA misgivings, support for midwifery appears to be growing. LeBourdais E CMAJ; 1988 Oct; 139(8):769-72. PubMed ID: 3167738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The American midwife controversy: a crisis of professsionalization. Kobrin FE Bull Hist Med; 1966; 40(4):350-63. PubMed ID: 5949832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cooperation of the obstetrician with the obstetrical nurse in single historical period and nowadays (author's transl)]. Stefánik S Cesk Gynekol; 1974 May; 39(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 4602451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An Australian history of the subordination of midwifery. Fahy K Women Birth; 2007 Mar; 20(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 16973426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [History of gynecology and perinatology in Croatia. Midwifery. Clinics and hospitals in Zagreb]. Drazancić A Lijec Vjesn; 1999 Mar; 121(3):100-8. PubMed ID: 10437351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sairey Gamps, feminine nurses and greedy monopolists: discourses of gender and professional identity in the Lancet and the British Medical Journal, 1886-1902. Stanley H Can Bull Med Hist; 2012; 29(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 22849250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The legal risk in obstetrics in XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries]. Seguy B J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37(8):783-90. PubMed ID: 18653290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The history and evolution of the Core Competencies for basic midwifery practice. Avery MD J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15749295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eavesdropping on the womb: the advent of fetal ausculatation. Sparrow MM Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2000; 63(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10752352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: "An Australian history of the subordination of midwifery". Purcal N Women Birth; 2007 Sep; 20(3):131; author reply 133. PubMed ID: 17588834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot study of primary care workers with a disability. Moloney R; Hayward R; Chambers R Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Dec; 50(461):984-5. PubMed ID: 11224972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Management of mother and child--ethical, surgical and institutional aspects of the history of obstetrics]. Schulz S Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Mar; 56(3):M35-8. PubMed ID: 8674950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwifery what nurses know and think. Katz A; Katz A Can Nurse; 2001 May; 97(5):23-7. PubMed ID: 11865604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The role of midwife during pregnancy and childbirth]. Baeyens C; Johansson C Rev Med Brux; 2008 Sep; 29(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 18949988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]