BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8314064)

  • 1. Effect of ignoring genotype-environment interaction on segregation analysis of quantitative traits.
    Tiret L; Abel L; Rakotovao R
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 8314064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complex segregation analysis of familial diseases with variable age of onset: comparison of different methods by a simulation study.
    Abel L; Garcia A; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(3):231-49. PubMed ID: 7557346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalence of the mixed and regressive models for genetic analysis. I. Continuous traits.
    Demenais FM; Bonney GE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(5):597-617. PubMed ID: 2591730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does accounting for gene-environment (GxE) interaction increase the power to detect the effect of a gene in a multifactorial disease?
    Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E; Norris JM; Khlat M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 24(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 12652524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The resolution of genotype x environment interaction in segregation analysis of nuclear families.
    Eaves LJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 6544238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical comparisons of two formulations of the logistic regressive models with the mixed model in segregation analysis of discrete traits.
    Demenais FM; Laing AE; Bonney GE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(6):419-35. PubMed ID: 1487139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regression diagnostics for the class A regressive model with quantitative phenotypes.
    Wang HM; Jones MP; Burns TL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(3):174-87. PubMed ID: 10446465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixed model segregation analysis of LDL-C concentration with genotype-covariate interaction.
    Konigsberg LW; Blangero J; Kammerer CM; Mott GE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 1916237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segregation analysis comparing liability and quantitative trait models for hypertension using the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data.
    Crockford GP; Bishop DT; Barrett JH
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S79. PubMed ID: 14975147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of genetic effects of nuclear-cytoplasmic interaction on quantitative traits: genetic model for diploid plants.
    Han L; Yang J; Zhu J
    J Genet Genomics; 2007 Jun; 34(6):562-8. PubMed ID: 17601616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Analytic methods for seed models with genotype x environment interactions].
    Zhu J
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1996; 23(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 8695177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness of the unified model to shared environmental effects in the analysis of dichotomous traits.
    Demenais F; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 2731710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segregation analysis of diastolic blood pressure in a large pedigree.
    Weissbecker KA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 8314077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic analysis combining path analysis with regressive models: the BETA path model of polygenic and familial environmental transmission.
    Li Z; Bonney GE; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(5):431-42. PubMed ID: 7835689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Path analysis under generalized marital resemblance: evaluation of the assumptions underlying the mixed homogamy model by the Monte Carlo method.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(2):373-88. PubMed ID: 2721930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No common major gene for apolipoprotein A-I and HDL3-C levels: evidence from bivariate segregation analysis.
    Juo SH; Beaty TH; Duffy DL; Coresh J; Kwiterovich PO
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 9915567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting analyses of continuous covariates in affected sibling pair linkage studies.
    Schmidt S; Qin X; Schmidt MA; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):541-52. PubMed ID: 17410529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segregation analysis of two-locus models regulating apolipoprotein-A1 levels.
    Juo SH; Beaty TH; Xu J; Prenger VL; Coresh J; Kwiterovich PO
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 9523212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Search for faster methods of fitting the regressive models to quantitative traits.
    Demenais FM; Murigande C; Bonney GE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):319-34. PubMed ID: 2253867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of relatives with phenotypes but missing genotypes in association studies for quantitative traits.
    Visscher PM; Duffy DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 16355405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.