115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8314378)
1. Indication for treatment can introduce bias in observational studies of surgical treatment.
Holmberg L; Steineck G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1993 Jun; 19(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 8314378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias in research.
Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opportunities for minimization of confounding in observational research.
Quartey G; Feudjo-Tepie M; Wang J; Kim J
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 22127842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confounding in evaluating the effectiveness of influenza vaccine.
Mori M; Oura A; Ohnishi H; Washio M
Vaccine; 2008 Nov; 26(50):6459-61. PubMed ID: 18573295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studies.
Sørensen HT; Lash TL; Rothman KJ
Hepatology; 2006 Nov; 44(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17058242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What random assignment does and does not do.
Krause MS; Howard KI
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
Touzet S; Colin C
Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should observational studies be a thing of the past?
Pritchard KI
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):451-2. PubMed ID: 18364499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
Villar J; Carroli G
Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.
Berger VW; Ivanova A; Knoll MD
Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3017-28. PubMed ID: 12973784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving quality improvement: a methodologic framework for evaluating effectiveness of surgical quality improvement.
Kao LS; Lally KP; Thomas EJ; Tyson JE
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):621-6. PubMed ID: 19476799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects.
Schmoor C; Caputo A; Schumacher M
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(9):1120-9. PubMed ID: 18334500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality.
Needleman I; Moles DR; Worthington H
Periodontol 2000; 2005; 37():12-28. PubMed ID: 15655022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reply to correspondence on randomization in surgical studies.
Grunkemeier GL; Starr A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 8269134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
