These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8314406)
1. The Delaware Limited Liability Company: a new form of business. Murphy LS Del Med J; 1993 May; 65(5):329-31. PubMed ID: 8314406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The limited liability company: an alternative business form. Oppenheim CB Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Aug; 8(8):7-12. PubMed ID: 10127547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Should your practice be a limited liability company? Burg B Med Econ; 1994 Dec; 71(23):113, 117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 10138862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Michigan Limited Liability Company. A new structure for medical practice. Cambridge JR Mich Med; 1993 Jul; 92(7):35-6. PubMed ID: 8231949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Structuring group medical practices: shareholder and partnership agreements. Gassman AS Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(4):19-26. PubMed ID: 10122125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limited liability company new option for physicians. Worrell DC; Tanner JH Indiana Med; 1993; 86(6):510-1. PubMed ID: 8270777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Registered Limited Liability Partnership Act. Battaglia VF Del Med J; 1993 Sep; 65(9):604. PubMed ID: 8253264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The partnership of professional corporations now has a dramatic new advantage. Beck LC; Kalogredis VJ; Anders GT Del Med J; 1979 Nov; 51(11):651-5. PubMed ID: 527734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New choice in form of organizing a group medical practice. Popper RJ Del Med J; 1993 Oct; 65(10):677-8. PubMed ID: 8253257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Minnesota Limited Liability Company Act. Physician groups likely to find new law beneficial. Steffen JK Minn Med; 1992 Nov; 75(11):37-9. PubMed ID: 1435648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical and legal considerations of private nutrition practice. Cross AT J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Jan; 95(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 7798576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Professional corporations and partnerships: some contrasts. Hannah HW J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1982 Jul; 181(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 7107484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Getting organized. Pros and cons of business structures for medical practice. Stern MZ Tex Med; 1995 Sep; 91(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 7570382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited liability companies--the physician joint venture of the future? Youra GP J Med Assoc Ga; 1993 Apr; 82(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 8515198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Americans with Disabilities Act: physician-shareholder practice groups and ADA compliance. Odem N; Blanck P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 12567039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. To incorporate or not to incorporate. Moskowitz LD; Griffith S Nurs Econ; 1984; 2(4):246-9. PubMed ID: 6565177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "I want to be my own boss: " Self-employment and legal business structures. Starr KT Nursing; 2016 May; 46(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 27096908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Michigan limited liability company--a new structure for dental practice. Weber RD J Mich Dent Assoc; 1993 Sep; 75(7):24, 26. PubMed ID: 8040856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Limited liability companies: the entity-of-choice is now available for Tennessee physicians. Griffith JL J Tenn Med Assoc; 1994 Oct; 87(10):439-40. PubMed ID: 7990457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are you liable for the medical malpractice of your co-owners? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1992 Dec; 81(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 1287124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]