These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8315048)

  • 21. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychiatrists and the parameters of expert testimony.
    Rogers R; Bagby RM; Chow MM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 1428422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Expert assessment in legal liability--from the physician's viewpoint].
    Zeller G
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1992 Aug; 86(15-16):750-3; discussion 761-6. PubMed ID: 1441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].
    Schreiber HL
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):626-30; discussion 631. PubMed ID: 9064936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Testimony of the psychiatric expert from the viewpoint of the criminal judge].
    Schmitt B
    Arch Kriminol; 1996; 198(1-2):38-54. PubMed ID: 8967830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Court experts, assessors and the public interest.
    Freckelton I
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 8(2):161-88. PubMed ID: 3957522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Ethical problems of insanity].
    Rutkowski R; Sobkowiak J
    Psychiatr Pol; 1991; 25(3-4):119-24. PubMed ID: 1821971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: an eight-state study.
    Callahan LA; Steadman HJ; McGreevy MA; Robbins PC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 1786413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prohibiting psychiatric diagnosis in insanity trials. With special reference to John W. Hinckley, Jr.
    Miller GH
    Psychiatry; 1986 May; 49(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 3725993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fitness to stand trial in Canada in light of the recent Criminal Code amendments.
    Davis S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 7995689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fitness and competency issues in Canadian criminal courts: elucidating the standards for mental health professionals.
    Whittemore KE; Ogloff JR
    Can J Psychiatry; 1994 May; 39(4):198-210. PubMed ID: 8044726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives].
    Nedopil N; Müller-Isberner R
    Nervenarzt; 1995 Nov; 66(11):793-801. PubMed ID: 8532095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry].
    Pietzcker A
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):623-6. PubMed ID: 9064935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Personality disorders and criminal responsibility: a second opinion.
    Rudnick A; Levy A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(4):409-20. PubMed ID: 7890474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.