These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8315158)

  • 21. Lip-jaw and tongue-jaw coordination during rate-controlled syllable repetitions.
    Hertrich I; Ackermann H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2236-47. PubMed ID: 10790049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physical characteristics of the lips underlying vowel lipreading performance.
    Montgomery AA; Jackson PL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2134-44. PubMed ID: 6875099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Managing the distinctiveness of phonemic nasal vowels: articulatory evidence from Hindi.
    Shosted R; Carignan C; Rong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):455-65. PubMed ID: 22280607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic and articulatory analysis of French vowels produced by congenitally blind adults and sighted adults.
    Ménard L; Toupin C; Baum SR; Drouin S; Aubin J; Tiede M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2975-87. PubMed ID: 24116433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Articulatory tongue shape analysis of Mandarin alveolar-retroflex contrast.
    Luo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):1961. PubMed ID: 33138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Compensation for a lip-tube perturbation in 4-year-olds: Articulatory, acoustic, and perceptual data analyzed in comparison with adults.
    Ménard L; Perrier P; Aubin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2514. PubMed ID: 27250147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of articulatory dynamics from acoustic signatures.
    Iskarous K; Nam H; Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3717-28. PubMed ID: 20550270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tongue- and Jaw-Specific Contributions to Acoustic Vowel Contrast Changes in the Diphthong /ai/ in Response to Slow, Loud, and Clear Speech.
    Mefferd AS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3144-3158. PubMed ID: 29067400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of blindness on production-perception relationships: Compensation strategies for a lip-tube perturbation of the French [u].
    Ménard L; Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Bellavance-Courtemanche M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2016; 30(3-5):227-48. PubMed ID: 26403592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate.
    Matthies M; Perrier P; Perkell JS; Zandipour M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):340-53. PubMed ID: 11324656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system.
    Callan DE; Kent RD; Guenther FH; Vorperian HK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):721-36. PubMed ID: 10877441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation of orofacial speeds with voice acoustic measures in the fluent speech of persons who stutter.
    McClean MD; Tasko SM
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 15248043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relationship between tongue positions and formant frequencies in female speakers.
    Lee J; Shaiman S; Weismer G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):426-40. PubMed ID: 26827037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A modeling investigation of articulatory variability and acoustic stability during American English /r/ production.
    Nieto-Castanon A; Guenther FH; Perkell JS; Curtin HD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3196-212. PubMed ID: 15957787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic measurements of articulator motions.
    Schroeder MR; Strube HW
    Phonetica; 1979; 36(4-5):302-13. PubMed ID: 523519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of acoustic and articulatory methods for analyzing vowel differences across dialects: Data from American and Australian English.
    Blackwood Ximenes A; Shaw JA; Carignan C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):363. PubMed ID: 28764447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. From EMG to formant patterns of vowels: the implication of vowel spaces.
    Maeda S; Honda K
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(1-3):17-29. PubMed ID: 8052671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interspeaker variability in hard palate morphology and vowel production.
    Lammert A; Proctor M; Narayanan S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1924-33. PubMed ID: 24687447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contrast between alveolar and velar stops with typical speech data: acoustic and articulatory analyses.
    Melo RM; Mota HB; Berti LC
    Codas; 2017 Jun; 29(3):e20160117. PubMed ID: 28614459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The trough effect: implications for speech motor programming.
    Lindblom B; Sussman HM; Modarresi G; Burlingame E
    Phonetica; 2002; 59(4):245-62. PubMed ID: 12486315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.