These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8315606)
21. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Wilczynski W; Rand AS; Ryan MJ Brain Behav Evol; 2001; 58(3):137-51. PubMed ID: 11910171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What determines the tuning of hearing organs and the frequency of calls? A comparative study in the katydid genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Schul J; Patterson AC J Exp Biol; 2003 Jan; 206(Pt 1):141-52. PubMed ID: 12456704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis). Cobo-Cuan A; Narins PM J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 31907715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mid-frequency suppression in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): mechanisms and implications for the evolution of acoustic communication. Gerhardt HC; Höbel G J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Aug; 191(8):707-14. PubMed ID: 15928971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Neotropical frogs and mating songs: The evolution of advertisement calls in glassfrogs. Escalona Sulbarán MD; Ivo Simões P; Gonzalez-Voyer A; Castroviejo-Fisher S J Evol Biol; 2019 Feb; 32(2):163-176. PubMed ID: 30481406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Close relationship between the frequency of 22-kHz calls and vocal tract length in male rats. Inagaki H; Takeuchi Y; Mori Y Physiol Behav; 2012 May; 106(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 22326645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Advertisement call of Hyla jimi and Hyla elianeae (Anura, Hylidae) in the Botucatu region, São Paulo, Brazil. Martins IA; Jim J Braz J Biol; 2004 Aug; 64(3B):645-54. PubMed ID: 15620003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Bioacoustic of the advertisement call of Ceratophrys cranwelli (Anura: Ceratophryidae)]. Valetti JA; Salas NE; Martino AL Rev Biol Trop; 2013 Mar; 61(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 23894980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A quantitative analysis of behavioral selectivity for pulse rise-time in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Gerhardt HC; Schul J J Comp Physiol A; 1999 Jul; 185(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 10450610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus). Hall IC; Woolley SM; Kwong-Brown U; Kelley DB J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jan; 202(1):17-34. PubMed ID: 26572136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae). Gerhardt HC; Martínez-Rivera CC; Schwartz JJ; Marshall VT; Murphy CG J Exp Biol; 2007 Sep; 210(Pt 17):2990-8. PubMed ID: 17704074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system. Schrode KM; Bee MA J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 6):837-48. PubMed ID: 25617467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nonlinear processing of a multicomponent communication signal by combination-sensitive neurons in the anuran inferior colliculus. Lee N; Schrode KM; Bee MA J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Sep; 203(9):749-772. PubMed ID: 28748486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Not so cryptic-differences between mating calls of Lukanov S PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17574. PubMed ID: 38948235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Decoupled Evolution between Senders and Receivers in the Neotropical Allobates femoralis Frog Complex. Betancourth-Cundar M; Lima AP; Hӧdl W; Amézquita A PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155929. PubMed ID: 27276054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative contractile dynamics of calling and locomotor muscles in three hylid frogs. McLister D; Stevens ED; Bogart JP J Exp Biol; 1995 Jul; 198(Pt 7):1527-38. PubMed ID: 7658189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How minute sooglossid frogs hear without a middle ear. Boistel R; Aubin T; Cloetens P; Peyrin F; Scotti T; Herzog P; Gerlach J; Pollet N; Aubry JF Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(38):15360-4. PubMed ID: 24003145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Visualization of a chorus structure in multiple frog species by a sound discrimination device. Awano H; Shirasaka M; Mizumoto T; Okuno HG; Aihara I J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2021 Jan; 207(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 33481121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two Neotropical hylid frogs. Caorsi VZ; Both C; Cechin S; Antunes R; Borges-Martins M PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183342. PubMed ID: 28854253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Elastic structures in the vocalization apparatus of the Túngara frog Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae). Jaramillo C; Rand AS; Ibáñez R; Dudley R J Morphol; 1997 Sep; 233(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 9259126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]