These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8316120)

  • 21. The citation index: what it is and what it isn't.
    Lowe J; Chapman S
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2000 Feb; 24(1):5. PubMed ID: 10777970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Article review process.
    Burr G
    Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When papers go bad--part 1, by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2004 Dec; 117(Pt 25):5953-4. PubMed ID: 15678575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Farther, faster, and (hopefully) better!
    Link AM; LaRusso NF
    Gastroenterology; 1992 Sep; 103(3):1099-101. PubMed ID: 1499911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical editor lambasts journals and editors.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7314):651. PubMed ID: 11566822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
    Glimelius B
    Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer-Review Mentorship: What It Is and Why We Need It.
    Haase KR; Dzurec L
    ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2019; 42(3):191-192. PubMed ID: 31356351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What can authors do for the papers they published in predatory journals?
    Dadkhah M; Darbani SM
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2016 Aug; 126(7-8):574-5. PubMed ID: 27510167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. From manuscript to publication.
    Yoder Wise PS
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 1992; 23(2):51. PubMed ID: 1564167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diversity, debate, and discourse.
    Haller KB
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(4):283. PubMed ID: 1941289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Structured abstracts.
    Lock S
    BMJ; 1988 Jul; 297(6642):156. PubMed ID: 3044505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Physicians' scientific production in the years after obtaining the Ph.D. degree].
    Jeppesen P; Hessellund A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Feb; 166(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 15045713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Impact factor and certification].
    Völcker HE
    Ophthalmologe; 2000 Sep; 97(9):607-8. PubMed ID: 11147332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.
    Evans JT; Nadjari HI; Burchell SA
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2304213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predatory publishers.
    Odom-Forren J
    J Perianesth Nurs; 2015 Apr; 30(2):87. PubMed ID: 25813294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.