BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8316636)

  • 21. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    Neely CB; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10087854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall.
    Frick RW
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):551-62. PubMed ID: 2796740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of recoding and presentation format on recency and suffix effects.
    Manning SK; Koehler L; Hampton S
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Mar; 18(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 2319958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reassessing the token set size effect on serial recall: Implications for theories of auditory distraction.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 30265053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Common processes underlie enhanced recency effects for auditory and changing-state stimuli.
    Glenberg AM
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):638-50. PubMed ID: 2266865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
    Neath I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recency and suffix effects as a function of auditory confusability and set size.
    Manning SK; Robinson II
    Am J Psychol; 1989; 102(4):495-510. PubMed ID: 2596615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
    Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An auditory analog of the picture superiority effect.
    Crutcher RJ; Beer JM
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21264626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.
    Jones D; Madden C; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 May; 44(4):645-69. PubMed ID: 1615168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Acoustic memory of the speech evoked by a 22-channel cochlear implant].
    Kumakawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1991 Aug; 94(8):1136-41. PubMed ID: 1960594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.
    Gathercole SE; Frankish CR; Pickering SJ; Peaker S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 9949710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).
    Baddeley AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 11082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability.
    Brady S; Shankweiler D; Mann V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Apr; 35(2):345-67. PubMed ID: 6842131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory word serial recall benefits from orthographic dissimilarity.
    Pattamadilok C; Lafontaine H; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 3):321-41. PubMed ID: 21033650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Capturing the suffix: cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall.
    Nicholls AP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 11827075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. First things first: similar list length and output order effects for verbal and nonverbal stimuli.
    Cortis C; Dent K; Kennett S; Ward G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1179-214. PubMed ID: 25528092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?
    Roodenrys S; Hinton M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11827085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.