188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8316699)
1. [Chronotropic competence in patients with the sick sinus syndrome wearing AAI or DDD pacemakers].
Goicolea de Oro A; Márquez L; López Gil M; Kallmeyer C; Chicote R; García-Cosío F
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 46(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 8316699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Benefits and limits of single chamber atrial pacing with adaptive rate].
Pouillot C; Mabo P; Lelong B; Cazeau S; Paillard F; de Place C; Daubert JC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Nov; 83(12):1833-42. PubMed ID: 2125194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Changes in sinus function at rest and during physical exertion after permanent atrial electrostimulation in patients with sick sinus syndrome].
Brignole M; Menozzi C; Sartore B; Barra M; Lolli G; Monducci I
G Ital Cardiol; 1987 Aug; 17(8):642-52. PubMed ID: 3692069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate control in patients with pacemaker affected by brady-tachy form of sick sinus syndrome.
Boriani G; Padeletti L; Santini M; Gulizia M; Orazi S; Botto G; Capucci A; Biffi M; Martignani C; Ricci R; Vimercati M; DiStefano P; Grammatico A
Am Heart J; 2007 Jul; 154(1):193-200. PubMed ID: 17584576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A blended sensor restores chronotropic response more favorably than an accelerometer alone in pacemaker patients: the LIFE study results.
Coman J; Freedman R; Koplan BA; Reeves R; Santucci P; Stolen KQ; Kraus SM; Meyer TE;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1433-42. PubMed ID: 18950301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
Masumoto H; Ueda Y; Kato R; Usui A; Maseki T; Takagi Y; Usui M
Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Behavior of various activity-controlled cardiac pacemakers in treadmill stress tests with variable slopes].
Matula M; Hölzer K; Zitzmann E; Schön H; Alt E
Z Kardiol; 1993 Feb; 82(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 8465563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of pacing rate and autonomic blockade on human primary and secondary atrial pacemakers.
Ndrepepa G; Cina P; Gjini V; Kondili A; Balla I; Kastrati A
Cardiologia; 1998 Mar; 43(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 9611857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The incremental benefit of rate-adaptive pacing on exercise performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Tse HF; Siu CW; Lee KL; Fan K; Chan HW; Tang MO; Tsang V; Lee SW; Lau CP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 46(12):2292-7. PubMed ID: 16360061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atrial adaptive rate pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects on exercise capacity and arrhythmias.
Haywood GA; Katritsis D; Ward J; Leigh-Jones M; Ward DE; Camm AJ
Br Heart J; 1993 Feb; 69(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8435244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Sick sinus syndrome indication: AAI/R versus DDD/R].
Kainz W
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2000; 150(19-21):407-9. PubMed ID: 11132433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of pacemaker telemetry as a diagnostic feature for detecting atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
Europace; 2004 Nov; 6(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 15519261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of exercise tolerance of treadmill test in patients with a cardiac pacemaker. A comparison of sick sinus syndrome (SSS) with complete A-V block (CAVB) on VVI mode pacing].
Fukumoto H; Minohara S; Nishimoto Y; Harunari H; Koyama E; Oku T; Kakimoto S; Kondo K; Nishimoto T; Kishida H
Kyobu Geka; 1985 Mar; 38(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 3999485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation by serial standardized testing of a new rate-responsive pacemaker sensor based on variations in myocardial contractility.
Clémenty J; Kobeissi A; Garrigue S; Jaïs P; Le Métayer P; Haïssaguerre M
Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 11333049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct comparison of a contractility and activity pacemaker sensor during treadmill exercise testing.
Erol-Yilmaz A; Tukkie R; De Boo J; Schrama T; Wilde A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov; 27(11):1493-9. PubMed ID: 15546303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of pacing modes on cardiac baroreflex function in permanently paced patients with sinus node dysfunction.
Tsurugi T; Abe H; Oginosawa Y; Kohno R; Yasumasu T; Nagatomo T; Otsuji Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 19(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 18284495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
