These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8316753)

  • 1. Performance of the Reflotron and the Seralyzer in primary health care.
    Thue G; Sandberg S
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1993 May; 53(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 8316753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of dry-chemistry instruments in primary health care.
    Sandberg S; Christensen NG; Thue G; Lund PK
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1989 Sep; 49(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 2595243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multicentre evaluation of the Ektachem DT60-, Reflotron- and Seralyzer III systems.
    Römer M; Haeckel R; Henco A; Vogt M; Thomas L; Keller HE; Appel W
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1992 Sep; 30(9):547-83. PubMed ID: 1457619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of hospital staff performance when using desk top analysers for "near patient" testing.
    Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
    J Clin Pathol; 1988 Feb; 41(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 3350985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Near-patient testing. Quality of laboratory test results obtained by non-technical personnel in a decentralized setting.
    Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1988 Jun; 89(6):797-801. PubMed ID: 3369374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Desktop analysers: quality of results obtained by medical office personnel.
    Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
    CMAJ; 1988 Mar; 138(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 3345476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audit of near patient cholesterol testing in occupational health clinics.
    Majeed FA; Turner HJ; Stuart JM; Cooper RD; Laite PA
    Occup Med (Lond); 1993 Feb; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8422442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the use of a dry chemistry analyser in primary care in Norway and the United Kingdom.
    Thue G; Sandberg S; Bullock DG
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Jan; 43(366):10-4. PubMed ID: 8457356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dry chemistry: an assessment of the BCL Reflotron system.
    Skinner AG; Bacon BJ; House JD
    Med Lab Sci; 1990 Oct; 47(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 2283928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cholesterol assays in the Seralyzer instrument.
    Lott JA; Miller IL; Crowley LE
    J Clin Lab Anal; 1989; 3(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 2760753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the creatinine assay on the Reflotron analyser under centralized and non-centralized conditions.
    Dols JL; Sanders GT
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Jun; 31(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 8369363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two solid phase chemistry systems: Reflotron and Ektachem DT 60.
    Rohac M; Gabl F
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1987 Nov; 25(11):811-21. PubMed ID: 2894403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Measurement of blood cholesterol, decentralized, using a Reflotron, or centralized in a laboratory. A comparison].
    Christensen TE; Agner E; Jensen SE; Jacobsen K; Mahnfeldt MS; Baastrup A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Nov; 152(45):3346-8. PubMed ID: 2238225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the Reflotron in the determination of cholesterol.
    Selmer R; Foss OP; Lund-Larsen PG
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1990 May; 50(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 2353155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Laboratory analyses in general practice. An evaluation of the Reflotron system].
    Staehr P; Berthelsen M; Nexø E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Apr; 153(15):1057-61. PubMed ID: 2024331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alkaline phosphatase activity: new assay for the Reflotron system. Results of the evaluation in eight clinical laboratories.
    Schumann G; Dominick HC; Hellmann D; Klauke R; Möckesch M; Stekel H; von Schenck H; Kraft M; Nagel R; Hänseler E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Jan; 39(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 11256805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Reflotron and laboratory cholesterol measurements.
    Kinlay S
    Med J Aust; 1988 Aug; 149(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 3398799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total error assessment of five methods for cholesterol screening.
    Miller WG; McKenney JM; Conner MR; Chinchilli VM
    Clin Chem; 1993 Feb; 39(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 8432020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reflotron cholesterol measurement in general practice: accuracy and detection of errors.
    Ball MJ; Robertson IK; Woods M
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1994 Nov; 31 ( Pt 6)():556-60. PubMed ID: 7880074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.