These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8318155)

  • 1. In vivo (CT scan) comparison of vertical shear in human tissue caused by various support surfaces.
    Conner LM; Clack JW
    Decubitus; 1993 Mar; 6(2):20-3, 26-8. PubMed ID: 8318155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Cullum N; McInnes E; Bell-Syer SE; Legood R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001735. PubMed ID: 15266452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative analysis of pressure and shear in the effectiveness of support surfaces.
    Fontaine R; Risley S; Castellino R
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1998 Sep; 25(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 9923257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevention of pressure ulcers with a static air support surface: A systematic review.
    Serraes B; van Leen M; Schols J; Van Hecke A; Verhaeghe S; Beeckman D
    Int Wound J; 2018 Jun; 15(3):333-343. PubMed ID: 29504266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the pressure-distributing properties of foam mattress overlays.
    Krouskop TA; Noble PS; Brown J; Marburger R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jul; 23(3):33-9. PubMed ID: 3772816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison of two pressure-reducing surfaces in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Warner DJ
    Decubitus; 1992 May; 5(3):52-5, 58-60, 62-4. PubMed ID: 1596352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of three types of alternating pressure air mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers in Belgian hospitals.
    Demarré L; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Grypdonck M; Clays E; Vanderwee K; Beeckman D
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 23907784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
    Colin D; Loyant R; Abraham P; Saumet JL
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8688975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microcirculatory responses of sacral tissue in healthy individuals and inpatients on different pressure-redistribution mattresses.
    Bergstrand S; Källman U; Ek AC; Engström M; Lindgren M
    J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):346-58. PubMed ID: 26562377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a new foam mattress with the standard hospital mattress.
    Gray DG; Smith M
    J Wound Care; 2000 Jan; 9(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 10827665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure-reducing capability of Conforma II mattress overlay.
    Reynolds A; Suarez C
    Adv Wound Care; 1994 Jul; 7(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 7827746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress.
    Black J; Berke C; Urzendowski G
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 22552108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positron emission tomography study of effects of two pressure-relieving support surfaces on pressure ulcer development.
    Soppi E; Knuuti J; Kalliokoski K
    J Wound Care; 2021 Jan; 30(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 33439081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preventing pressure sores: matching patient and mattress using interface pressure measurements.
    Clark M; Rowland LB
    Decubitus; 1989 Feb; 2(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 2751833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Egerton Convertible II and the Elite 3 bed system.
    Lowthian P
    Br J Nurs; 1996 Jan 25-Feb 7; 5(2):118, 120-3. PubMed ID: 8680245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the right mix of support surfaces to minimize hospital acquired pressure ulcers.
    Sylvia CJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993 Oct; 39(8):12-6. PubMed ID: 8311903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supine interface pressure in children.
    Solis I; Krouskop T; Trainer N; Marburger R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Jul; 69(7):524-6. PubMed ID: 3389994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principles of alternating pressure surfaces.
    McLeod AG
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(7):30-6. PubMed ID: 9450404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 4-cm thermoactive viscoelastic foam pad on the operating room table to prevent pressure ulcer during cardiac surgery.
    Feuchtinger J; de Bie R; Dassen T; Halfens R
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Feb; 15(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 16422733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.