77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8318573)
1. Evaluation of the "Auto-Stat 6010" automatic osmometer and its comparison with the "digimatic-advanced 3DII" manual osmometer.
Elorza MA; Garcia A; Fuster A; Muller A
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Apr; 31(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 8318573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of two osmometers at the clinical chemistry laboratory].
Belhouachi N; Jaisson S; Garnotel R; Gillery P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2007; 65(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 17913674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a new tear osmometer for repeatability and accuracy, using 0.5-microL (500-Nanoliter) samples.
Yildiz EH; Fan VC; Banday H; Ramanathan LV; Bitra RK; Garry E; Asbell PA
Cornea; 2009 Jul; 28(6):677-80. PubMed ID: 19512902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements of solutions and contact lenses with a vapor pressure osmometer.
Stahl U; Ho A; Brent G; Naduvilath T; Stapleton F
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 17435516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of 3 automatic systems for measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate].
Besson I; Kinder M; Jou JM; Vives Corrons JL
Sangre (Barc); 1995 Apr; 40(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 7784938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dewpoint and freezing point osmometry.
Mercier DE; Feld RD; Witte DL
Am J Med Technol; 1978 Nov; 44(11):1066-9. PubMed ID: 717430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the monocyte counting by two automated haematology analysers compared with flow cytometry.
Grimaldi E; Carandente P; Scopacasa F; Romano MF; Pellegrino M; Bisogni R; De Caterina M
Clin Lab Haematol; 2005 Apr; 27(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 15784123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the Cell-DYN 35))].
Costa MJ; Reis AB; Silva C; Fernandes I; Lopes S; Júnior E
Acta Med Port; 1996; 9(10-12):309-18. PubMed ID: 9254527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and precision of the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer: an analytical point of view.
Pidetcha P; Ornvichian S; Chalachiva S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Apr; 83(4):445-50. PubMed ID: 10808706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical performance of the i-STAT cardiac troponin I assay.
Apple FS; Murakami MM; Christenson RH; Campbell JL; Miller CJ; Hock KG; Scott MG
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Jul; 345(1-2):123-7. PubMed ID: 15193986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic comparison of bias and precision data obtained with multiple-point and one-point calibration in six validated multianalyte assays for quantification of drugs in human plasma.
Peters FT; Maurer HH
Anal Chem; 2007 Jul; 79(13):4967-76. PubMed ID: 17518444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of portable point of care instrument: the i-Stat . Report of 7,000 analyses].
Feuillu A; Morel I; Mollard JF
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2002; 60(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 11937440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multi-center quality control study of different CA15-3 immunoassays.
Hubl W; Demant T; Albrecht S; Bewarder N; Grunow G; Keller R; Klapdor R; Klos KJ; Kruse K; Müller R; Päge I; Schmidt R; Stolle H; Wiefelspütz J; vom Baur E; Zinsmeyer J; Zwirner M
Clin Lab; 2005; 51(11-12):641-5. PubMed ID: 16329622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the automated AxSYM and ADVIA centaur immunoassays for homocysteine determination.
Haltmayer M; Mueller T; Gegenhuber A; Poelz W
Clin Lab; 2004; 50(3-4):175-80. PubMed ID: 15074472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the hemoglobin A1c-analyzer TOSOH HLC-723 G7.
Gremmels HD; Richter A; Watzke I
Clin Lab; 2003; 49(5-6):243-50. PubMed ID: 15285181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analytical evaluation of the Tosoh HLC-723 G7 automated HPLC analyzer for hemoglobin A2 and F determination.
Paleari R; Cannata M; Leto F; Maggio A; Demartis FR; Desogus MF; Galanello R; Mosca A
Clin Biochem; 2005 Feb; 38(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 15642279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of pipetting systems. II. Precision and accuracy of precision dispensers].
Loría A; Salas R
Rev Invest Clin; 1990; 42(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 2267451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
