These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8318898)

  • 21. Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles.
    Mittag T; Forman-Kay JD
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 17250999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simultaneous single-structure and bundle representation of protein NMR structures in torsion angle space.
    Gottstein D; Kirchner DK; Güntert P
    J Biomol NMR; 2012 Apr; 52(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 22351031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Solution structure of the Grb2 N-terminal SH3 domain complexed with a ten-residue peptide derived from SOS: direct refinement against NOEs, J-couplings and 1H and 13C chemical shifts.
    Wittekind M; Mapelli C; Lee V; Goldfarb V; Friedrichs MS; Meyers CA; Mueller L
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(4):933-52. PubMed ID: 9135122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation?
    Clore GM; Schwieters CD
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Mar; 126(9):2923-38. PubMed ID: 14995210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interpreting NMR data for beta-peptides using molecular dynamics simulations.
    Trzesniak D; Glättli A; Jaun B; van Gunsteren WF
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Oct; 127(41):14320-9. PubMed ID: 16218626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mixture models for protein structure ensembles.
    Hirsch M; Habeck M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(19):2184-92. PubMed ID: 18662925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Toward an accurate determination of free energy landscapes in solution states of proteins.
    De Simone A; Richter B; Salvatella X; Vendruscolo M
    J Am Chem Soc; 2009 Mar; 131(11):3810-1. PubMed ID: 19292482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Small structural ensembles for a 17-nucleotide mimic of the tRNA T psi C-loop via fitting dipolar relaxation rates with the quadratic programming algorithm.
    Schmitz U; Donati A; James TL; Ulyanov NB; Yao L
    Biopolymers; 1998 Oct; 46(5):329-42. PubMed ID: 9754029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The solution structure of a cytotoxic ribonuclease from the oocytes of Rana catesbeiana (bullfrog).
    Chang CF; Chen C; Chen YC; Hom K; Huang RF; Huang TH
    J Mol Biol; 1998; 283(1):231-44. PubMed ID: 9761686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Solution structure of murine macrophage inflammatory protein-2.
    Shao W; Jerva LF; West J; Lolis E; Schweitzer BI
    Biochemistry; 1998 Jun; 37(23):8303-13. PubMed ID: 9622482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.
    Mehler EL; Hassan SA; Kortagere S; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):673-90. PubMed ID: 16729264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conformational sampling for large-scale virtual screening: accuracy versus ensemble size.
    Griewel A; Kayser O; Schlosser J; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2303-11. PubMed ID: 19788252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Amplitudes and directions of internal protein motions from a JAM analysis of 15N relaxation data.
    Kitao A; Wagner G
    Magn Reson Chem; 2006 Jul; 44 Spec No():S130-42. PubMed ID: 16823895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Residue-level global and local ensemble-ensemble comparisons of protein domains.
    Clark SA; Tronrud DE; Karplus PA
    Protein Sci; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1528-42. PubMed ID: 26032515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sampling of the native conformational ensemble of myoglobin via structures in different crystalline environments.
    Kondrashov DA; Zhang W; Aranda R; Stec B; Phillips GN
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(2):353-62. PubMed ID: 17680690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NMR characterization of partially folded and unfolded conformational ensembles of proteins.
    Barbar E
    Biopolymers; 1999; 51(3):191-207. PubMed ID: 10516571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conformation spaces of proteins.
    Sullivan DC; Kuntz ID
    Proteins; 2001 Mar; 42(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 11170204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative evaluation of experimental NMR restraints.
    Nabuurs SB; Spronk CA; Krieger E; Maassen H; Vriend G; Vuister GW
    J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Oct; 125(39):12026-34. PubMed ID: 14505424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accurate prediction of protein torsion angles using chemical shifts and sequence homology.
    Neal S; Berjanskii M; Zhang H; Wishart DS
    Magn Reson Chem; 2006 Jul; 44 Spec No():S158-67. PubMed ID: 16823900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.