These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 831929)

  • 21. Limitations of mammography.
    Fordham SD
    Int Surg; 1977 Mar; 62(3):138-9. PubMed ID: 852932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnosis of breast carcinoma. An evaluation of clinical examination, mammography, thermography and aspiration biopsy in breast disease.
    Bjurstam N; Hedberg K; Hultborn KA; Johansson NT; Johnsén C
    Prog Surg; 1974; 13():1-65. PubMed ID: 4614325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why and by whom are patients referred for mammography?
    Bach K; Strandberg C; Bitsch K; Brünner S
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():122-6. PubMed ID: 2236852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of state-of-the-art mammography in the detection of nonpalpable breast carcinoma.
    Kaplan C; Matallana R; Wallack MK
    Am Surg; 1990 Jan; 56(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 2153010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The role of mammography in the diagnosis of occult carcinoma of the breast].
    Antalík J
    Cesk Radiol; 1984 May; 38(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 6744452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Value of mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Brünner N; Rasmussen SG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1978 Nov; 140(48):2984-6. PubMed ID: 726103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Information content of radiological signs of malignant and benign lesions of the breast in the mammogram].
    Hermanutz D; Linzbach C; Zerwas M
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972 Sep; 117(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 4342579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Use and value of mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Gropp H
    Z Allgemeinmed; 1974 Jan; 50(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 4814873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The results of galactography -- a contribution to the early diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast (author's transl)].
    Fröhlich G; Inoue Y
    Rofo; 1976 Apr; 124(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 131768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Role of the general practitioner in breast cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Aalders CJ; Schadé E
    J Cancer Educ; 1991; 6(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 1931597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Significance of roentgen symptomatics of 425 breast carcinomas in 10000 mammographies (author's transl)].
    Schneider G
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):307-17. PubMed ID: 675058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experience with contrast mammography in the diagnosis of various breast diseases.
    Weshler Z; Horn Y; Siew F
    Isr J Med Sci; 1975 May; 11(5):448-57. PubMed ID: 1158657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of direct referrals on time to diagnosis after an abnormal breast screening result.
    Decker KM; Harrison M; Chateau D
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2004; 28(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 15542262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians.
    Fox SA; Klos DS; Tsou CV
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):431-3. PubMed ID: 3336718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Value of x-ray findings for the diagnosis of carcinoma in situ of the breast from the clinical point of view].
    Heidenreich W; Bockslaff H; Töllner D; Börner P
    Fortschr Med; 1976 May; 94(13):745-9. PubMed ID: 182626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Delayed assessment of mammographic abnormalities.
    Lancet; 1988 May; 1(8596):1218-9. PubMed ID: 2897021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Screening mammography referral rates for women ages 50 to 69 years by recently-licensed family physicians: physician and practice environment correlates.
    Haggerty J; Tamblyn R; Abrahamowicz M; Beaulieu MD; Kishchuk N
    Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 10564631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breast cancer screening in two multicultural family practice teaching clinics.
    Lubish L; Greenberg S; Friger M; Shvartzman P
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Aug; 3(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 11519382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Mammography. Examination method for tracing and early recognition of mammary carcinoma].
    Schlitter HE; Bürger H
    Med Klin; 1966 Nov; 61(44):1739-43. PubMed ID: 4865840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of family physicians on mammography screening.
    Lemkau JP; Grady KE
    Am Fam Physician; 1998 Sep; 58(4):854, 856, 859. PubMed ID: 9767721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.