These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8319332)

  • 1. Relation between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in humans.
    Chen PS; Feld GK; Kriett JM; Mower MM; Tarazi RY; Fleck RP; Swerdlow CD; Gang ES; Kass RM
    Circulation; 1993 Jul; 88(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 8319332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.
    Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.
    Chen PS; Feld GK; Mower MM; Peters BB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1939961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use-dependent effects of lidocaine on the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.
    Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 23(7):1688-92. PubMed ID: 8195533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm and the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Hui RC; Rosenthal L; Ramza B; Nsah E; Lawrence J; Tomaselli G; Berger R; Calkins H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 21(4 Pt 1):687-93. PubMed ID: 9584298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upper limit of vulnerability reliably predicts the defibrillation threshold in humans.
    Hwang C; Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; Gang ES; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5):2308-14. PubMed ID: 7955188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability to fibrillation in a transthoracic guinea pig model.
    Li H; Malkin RA
    J Electrocardiol; 1999 Apr; 32(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 10338034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks.
    Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
    Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ICD Shock, Not Ventricular Fibrillation, Causes Elevation of High Sensitive Troponin T after Defibrillation Threshold Testing--The Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre TropShock-Trial.
    Semmler V; Biermann J; Haller B; Jilek C; Sarafoff N; Lennerz C; Vrazic H; Zrenner B; Asbach S; Kolb C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131570. PubMed ID: 26208329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.
    Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal strength and number of shocks at upper limit of vulnerability testing required to predict high defibrillation threshold without inducing ventricular fibrillation.
    Takami K; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Takei A; Kiuchi K; Kanda G; Kumagai H; Takami M; Torii-Tanaka S; Itoh M; Imamura K; Fujiwara R; Suzuki A; Nakanishi T; Yamashita S; Matsumoto A; Hirata K
    Circ J; 2013; 77(10):2490-6. PubMed ID: 23877733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.
    Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
    Swerdlow CD; Shehata M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of adequate safety margin using single coupling interval-upper limit of vulnerability test.
    Patel MB; Pandya K; Thakur RK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 24033830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms of defibrillation. Critical points and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Walcott GP; Walcott KT; Ideker RE
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():1-6. PubMed ID: 8656095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mechanism of induction and termination of ventricular fibrillation--significance of dispersion of ventricular repolarization].
    Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR; Schultheiss HP
    Z Kardiol; 2000 Dec; 89(12):1098-107. PubMed ID: 11201025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.