These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8319454)
1. The emerging legal consensus about end of life decisions. Healey JM Conn Med; 1993 May; 57(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 8319454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States. Harvey JC Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Euthanasia without request--euthanasia in impaired judgment]. Lauter H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 8442366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Euthanasia by request--from the medical viewpoint]. Helmchen H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 8442364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal trends in bioethics. Forster HP J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 11252921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Egregious inaction: five years later after Of Life and Death. Downie J Health Law Rev; 2000; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15706705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal aspects of withholding and withdrawing life support from critically ill patients in the United States and providing palliative care to them. Luce JM; Alpers A Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2000 Dec; 162(6):2029-32. PubMed ID: 11112108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Listening to patients: a clear sign for hospitals. Interview by Matthew D. Pavelich. Lapointe A Leadersh Health Serv; 1992; 1(4):10-1, 17. PubMed ID: 10123131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withdrawing life support: a legal assessment and a possible response. Blum JD Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Apr; 13(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 10266235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues of concern when drafting a physician-assisted suicide statute. Lieberson AD Quinnipiac Health Law J; 1999; 2(2):149-66. PubMed ID: 15712427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The choice to refuse to withhold medical treatment: the emerging technology and medical-ethical consensus. Clarke AM Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 May; 3(3):5-51. PubMed ID: 10295103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctrine of consent poses questions in terminating life support system. Part 2. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979; 12(5):38-41. PubMed ID: 10244575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quarterly report of the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc. Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):v-vi. PubMed ID: 9029840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician-assisted suicide and palliative care: beliefs and empiricism in the policy debate. Schwartz HI; Curry L Conn Med; 2002 Nov; 66(11):699-702. PubMed ID: 12476513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. End-of-life decision making: rethinking the principles of fundamental justice in the context of emerging empirical data. Florencio PS; Keller RH Health Law J; 1999; 7():233-58. PubMed ID: 11066366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]