104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8320064)
1. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Doi K; Schmidt RA
Invest Radiol; 1993 Jun; 28(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 8320064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
J Digit Imaging; 1994 Feb; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 8172975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 8208220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Metz CE; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1991; 18(5):955-63. PubMed ID: 1961160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized detection of masses from digitized mammograms: comparison of single-image segmentation and bilateral-image subtraction.
Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1995 Dec; 2(12):1056-61. PubMed ID: 9419682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Wolverton DE; Schmidt RA; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):155-68. PubMed ID: 9522881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of difference of Gaussian filters in the detection of mammographic regions.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4104-14. PubMed ID: 17153390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized identification of suspicious regions for masses in digitized mammograms.
Chang YH; Zheng B; Gur D
Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 8675422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
