183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8320065)
1. Single-exposure dual-energy chest images with computed radiography. Evaluation with simulated pulmonary nodules.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Naito H; Tamura S; Kozuka T; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Invest Radiol; 1993 Jun; 28(6):482-7. PubMed ID: 8320065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Naito H; Arisawa J; Tamura S; Kozuka T; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):407-12. PubMed ID: 7824718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography of the chest: effect of a computer-aided diagnosis system (Part 2).
Kido S; Kuriyama K; Kuroda C; Nakamura H; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Eur J Radiol; 2002 Dec; 44(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 12468069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted).
Ebner L; Bütikofer Y; Ott D; Huber A; Landau J; Roos JE; Heverhagen JT; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25794062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography of the chest (part 1).
Kido S; Nakamura H; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Eur J Radiol; 2002 Dec; 44(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 12468068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Patak MA; Yuksel-Hatz S; Ruder T; Vock P
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1289-96. PubMed ID: 19936752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images.
Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Ikeda M
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 3289096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography: technical considerations, clinical applications, and imaging pitfalls.
Gilkeson RC; Sachs PB
J Thorac Imaging; 2006 Nov; 21(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 17110857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Patak MA; Yuksel-Hatz S; Ruder T; Vock P
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 17899105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement of detection in computed radiography by new single-exposure dual-energy subtraction.
Ito W; Shimura K; Nakajima N; Ishida M; Kato H
J Digit Imaging; 1993 Feb; 6(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8439582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Single exposure energy subtraction chest radiography--clinical survey on utility of bone image].
Kamimura R; Takashima T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 May; 49(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 2798052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 28(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20437132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical application of single dual-energy subtraction technique with digital storage-phosphor radiography.
Kamimura R; Takashima T
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):21-4. PubMed ID: 7734535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of digital tomosynthesis and dual energy subtraction digital radiography in detecting pulmonary nodules.
Kumar SG; Garg MK; Khandelwal N; Gupta P; Gupta D; Aggarwal AN; Bansal SC
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1383-91. PubMed ID: 25892052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
