These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8320644)

  • 1. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques.
    Hsu CC; Millstein PL; Stein RS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jun; 69(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 8320644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
    Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
    Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Transfer Impression Techniques for Osseointegrated Implants.
    Zen BM; Soares EF; Rodrigues MA; Luthi LF; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):662-7. PubMed ID: 25438007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses.
    Tarib NA; Seong TW; Chuen KM; Kun MS; Ahmad M; Kamarudin KH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22474935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.