These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8322345)

  • 1. [Prospective comparative studies as tools for quality assurance. Important when laparoscopic techniques are introduced].
    Buanes T; Høgevold HE; Raeder MG
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Jun; 113(16):1978-81. PubMed ID: 8322345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The influence of obesity on early results and quality of life of patients after chosen operations performed by laparoscopic or open methods].
    Kuligowska A; Majewski WD
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2007; 53(3):119-27. PubMed ID: 18595494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introduction of laparoscopic techniques in gastrointestinal surgery: experience at a Norwegian university hospital as revealed by prospective comparative studies.
    Buanes T; Raeder MG
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1993 Feb; 3(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 8258066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cost-benefit calculations in laparoscopic surgery. Substantial total benefits, but extra expenses for hospitals are required--reversed effect].
    Buanes T; Sørensen BA; Stadaas JO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Jun; 113(16):2007-9. PubMed ID: 8322354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?].
    Horstmann R; Tiwisina C; Classen C; Palmes D; Gillessen A
    Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Feb; 130(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 15717240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Laparoscopic appendectomy after the learning curve].
    Rezola E; Villanueva A; Garay J; Suñol M; Arana J; Intxaurrondo MI; Eizaguirre I
    Cir Pediatr; 2008 Jul; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 18756872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative trial.
    Buanes T; Mjåland O
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1996 Aug; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 8840447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.
    Kelley JE; Burrus RG; Burns RP; Graham LD; Chandler KE
    Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8480927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.
    Yau KK; Siu WT; Tang CN; Yang GP; Li MK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jul; 205(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 17617333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in suspected acute appendicitis in female patients].
    Navarra G; Ascanelli S; Turini A; Carcoforo P; Tonini G; Pozza E
    Ann Ital Chir; 2002; 73(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 12148423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children.
    Li P; Xu Q; Ji Z; Gao Y; Zhang X; Duan Y; Guo Z; Zheng B; Guo X; Wu X
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Aug; 40(8):1279-83. PubMed ID: 16080932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.
    Peiser JG; Greenberg D
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2002 Feb; 4(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 11875999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].
    Dirksen CD; Schmitz RF; Hans KM; Nieman FH; Hoogenboom LJ; Go PM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2434-9. PubMed ID: 11776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children.
    Lintula H; Kokki H; Vanamo K
    Br J Surg; 2001 Apr; 88(4):510-4. PubMed ID: 11298617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Acute appendicitis--open or laparoscopic surgery?].
    Strzałka M; Bobrzyński A; Budzyński A; Biesiada Z; Rembiasz K
    Przegl Lek; 2003; 60 Suppl 7():70-4. PubMed ID: 14679698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.
    Hellberg A; Rudberg C; Kullman E; Enochsson L; Fenyö G; Graffner H; Hallerbäck B; Johansson B; Anderberg B; Wenner J; Ringqvist I; Sörensen S
    Br J Surg; 1999 Jan; 86(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 10027359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective analysis of 192 consecutive cholecystectomies: a comparative study between laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Constant E; Janssen P; Nys JM; el Fouly PE; Lemmens F; Hachez L; Hauters P
    Acta Chir Belg; 1995; 95(6):254-60. PubMed ID: 8571715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in West Bengal, India.
    Utpal D
    Chin J Dig Dis; 2005; 6(4):165-9. PubMed ID: 16246224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.
    Piskun G; Kozik D; Rajpal S; Shaftan G; Fogler R
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Jul; 15(7):660-2. PubMed ID: 11591963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study].
    Henle KP; Beller S; Rechner J; Zerz A; Szinicz G; Klingler A
    Chirurg; 1996 May; 67(5):526-30; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 8777883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.